'At the Kurdish issue, the mind and heart' are starting to like your article titled, "Republican Revolution, a leading figure in the world press, especially Falih Rifki Atay, 1943, his stop in Iraq is a journey, looked back at the past, an accounting is a bit cynical: Oh, these Ottoman reign, the Hijaz Emirate yükseltmemek sheriff was to persist until their parçalanıncaya. Husband of the British Empire a şeriflikten we took the three kings. British tailors the most talented man! "The essence of this particular excerpt, but please explain a little?
Yes, the essence of a quote to be very specific, but maybe a little gloss. What Falih Rifki Atay says there? Went to Iraq in 43. Then there is Iraq, King Faisal. King Faisal the First World War, in agreement with the British during the revolt against the Ottomans. Launched the Arab revolt. In fact, upon which there is a lot of discussion. But as a result of this rebellion in the Middle East after the Sharif Hussein who dream of a great Arab kingdom Hicaz'ı even had to leave. Faisal, however, before the sons of Syria, and then became the king of Iraq. Abdullah, the king of Jordan under the name of the country was founded. Ali, son of the king of the Hijaz was too young for a short period. So the three kings are the Hijaz şerifliğinden. Not like this analogy, but if you insist on some trends ignore people experience unpleasant things. Be perceived as threatening to tell it. But at the time this way ...
I do not find very meaningful examples of the IRA and ETA
Previously, the "Kurdish problem could become even more late kalınırsa an international issue," said. I also highlight always shouts, "Late whether or not the power!"
Yes. Because I wrote a letter to the Kurdish issue without direct relevance sign him but also thinking, "Dreams and ghosts," he ... Atatürk Nutuk'un said on the one part of today's Turkish, so I expressed briefly. He "got rid of the shadows of the past, the visionary for the future should not be," he said. Such a declaration is used a lot lately. In fact, 'Dreams and Shadows' he was the title of this book, about the Middle East ... Now, almost became a phrase used on this region. I "and the ghosts of Dreams" also took note. See when I saw in Jordan, martyrdom, that those who died there, 1 Cihan War Arab rebellion became a martyr, martyrdom in the museum, a photograph of Mustafa Kemal was sitting at a table with King Abdullah of Jordan. Very sad, but so many lessons to be taken in a photo karesiydi. Mustafa Kemal, the founder of the republic being made beyond the generalship of the Ottoman army, military tasks have in Tripoli, Damascus there. This experience comes from within. One end of the Ottoman military. Full lived in the days of the dissolution of the empire, especially one who served in Arab countries and the Arab revolt that really knows the cost of the Ottoman Empire. WW1 is already being lost, but of course the Germans are losing quite a waist twisting of the Ottoman Empire in the Middle East Arab revolt ... And then it turns out the land quickly by hand. That's all they have witnessed, this process has taken place in the republic after the installation of a man, father, Sharif Hussein and King Abdullah the Arab revolt started by sitting at a table with a little ice is not a difficult job. Here I am on the Kurdish issue "Late whether or not the power," reminding them to say all I'm saying. Because of this kind requires extraordinary circumstances to overcome these challenges. Uhuletle and suhuletle ... Great leaders manages it. In fact, this difficulty is not necessarily a great leader, rather than the society that must be overcome together. You must be sought ways. 'Not too late to get the power' is a second reason for me to say, may not be too late if at all. May be provisions are delayed.
Taha Akyol'la an interview we did, "Turks and Kurds in this country so intertwined that s the end of Yugoslavia could be worse," he said. And I had an instance of the India-Pakistan ...
Your mind is a way. I also remember the example I gave açılımda. "God not Preserve Turkey to India, returned to Spain or something," I said ...
So how this issue is resolved? The trend evolves to where?
This matter what formula you have a prescription, nor in this context I have a general prediction. I do not know what will happen a year later, it looks at issues such as stars whose fortune is not at all upon those who would not comment.
To avoid us ending like Yugoslavia or the India-Pakistan needs to do what?
History offers us a lot of experience, so we read history. We encounter these things percolate, that you can move them in the name of a thing ... But history does not give us a prescription. Every situation is different. India could suggest why today? And close away from a lot of examples like that? Now I'm very worried, but the Kurdish issue compares the Israeli-Palestinian issue ...
One söyleşimizde "may be the Kurdish intifada" had said that ...
Yes. I hope not, but ... Çağrışacak From there, take a tip from one side to suggest or have us another dimension in this example. "And my brother is really the state of Israel, such as provider? Pity that we face living here for years, "be said. True, but no matter what, in terms of political experience, she is a size issue, see the course we have to consider all of these terms. The love of Israel, the Kurds have nothing to do with the Palestinians instead of putting ... Example of exactly the same way, our problem of India may not like. But they may give a clue.
The Kurdish issue is a brake, but that both good and bad religion
"For Turkey to talk to stray too hard, too costly," you say. And one should also say to develop its own model.
Yes ... The examples of India and Pakistan could suggest so. So far more examples of the IRA and ETA was given. I frankly do not find them very meaningful. Of course, they also need to look at, it can be an asset in the samples, but just not right to compare them ... This situation is very different. But as I said a few things we can learn from these experiences, we can on the agenda model, but Spain 'made in other countries, even in a Western country and that they made peace processes' have no meaning outside the lot. Because such things happened there with us, first of all, so people did not die.
Abdulmalik late Euphrates, "Turks and Kurds, but he is no longer a religion that holds the cement began to unravel," he said. There is perhaps not such a different structure?
One of the things that cause serious hardship to the process already, this ... That is religion. Turkey has used it in the state. So long as you have the unity of religion, he thought that the way it goes ... Yes, it is the unity of religion means a lot, but also creates a difficulty. Nesting for the unity of religion is more ... This is both a good thing, because just before the transformation into a mutual conflict is very important that the brake as a brake, and I still think it works very well, but in a different format, such as autonomy on the other hand when you disconnected when you live together in front of you brings something to push this process further. In other words, Ertugrul Özkök'e 'will be away on leave,' a situation does not make us, because it is very complicated ... Both the economic sense, because the Kurds have migrated to the West, as well as have geçmişlik intertwined. As you can appreciate how much secularized Turkey, if we let religious, ethnic and even sectarian differences, differences that can pass beyond. Marriage of a Sunni Kurd and an Alevi Kurd, a Sunni Kurd and Sunni difficult marriage to a Turk. Maybe you recently may have changed slightly the way it is ...
Indeed, recent research "is no longer evlenmiyor Kurds and Turks," he turns out the results ...
This is a new development ... Until very recently was the case. So he creates a difficulty. Have formed families. Have their children.
MHP, 'We wish success to friends in the Kurdish' problem does not end even say to
My brother's wife Vartolu Mus ... Secret Sakık'a also asked "Do you go by taking my nephew to see the visa?" She laughed ...
He does things like that ... So I give the example of India. Different dates, is a completely different social conditions. But then you see what happened? There were religious differences, and it is something much more decisive. But in a matter of determination in terms of parallelism can be established. Muslims in Pakistan he described only yaşamıyorlardı region. Lived in other areas ... At the same time, the Hindus in the Pakistan border, he had separated, were Sikhs ... There were also Muslims living in India. So what happened to the separation halledildiğinde at a desk? Displaced from their homes who do not want to leave, even if people do not agree that the fear of life left after a while ... In other words, "We no longer barındırmazlar around here. We picked a piece of which he canımıza our readers, "he jumped trains, took to the roads. There are also people living in "And they set up their own state aldırtmazlar us breathe," he tried to emigrate to the other side. 1 million people died in the process ... After that India and Pakistan fought three times. Three times that many people did not die even savaşınca. Therefore, these issues may dwell so much on issues. Now, I begin to talk at the moment the issue of autonomy, that is not no ihtilafımız, even anlaşsa everyone about it, say it was mutual trust, denildiki "Both sides have reservations at a table talk", was talked about, now do not have any burrs, MHP, "the Kurdish We wish good luck to friends, "he said, that even in this case have so much trouble! So much so that a long process ... If you are going to be patırtısız as I said, this is not an issue the parties anlaşsa solved even today and tomorrow. He has so much dimension to that! Geographic size available, people are intertwined ... In the same issue, but give an example of the risks, but 1 million people died because of the separation of India and Pakistan 150 million Muslims living in India, but still ...
Should we not be together then? Is it possible to not have?
Gandhi died in this cause. I like everyone. Yes, live together, in my opinion ... What is there? But we can not see a lot of other things ...
So, the process goes to leave? Is So endişelenenler worried in vain?
We can not predict that none of the long term. Nothing is forever survive unchanged in the long run we all will be dead. Hüvelbaki (eternity) to Allah.
No comments:
Post a Comment