As I said such a diplomatic "ifşaatlar" coeval with the history of diplomacy. Immediately came to my mind, and not just for us for the world at the time of the Bolsheviks after the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, revealing their secret agreements. One of them is the United Kingdom and France, the Russian Tsardom also been involved in the 1917 Sykes-Picot Treaty. With this treaty, the Allies and the Ottoman Empire between them shared the Tsarist kabullenmişti it too. Disclosure of the Bolsheviks and Turkey and the world had learned of the secret treaty. Though I did not have the power to resist it, and Empire in Turkey's already broken. However, unlike the majority of the Arab peoples, the British co-operation at the Sheriff Hussein and some Arab nationalists, they realized that the promised an independent Arab state was a deception. Another important result of the Bolshevik ifşaatının the time, initiated by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson's "open diplomacy" was current.
ŞAŞIRMIYORUZ WHY?
Since the beginning of modern diplomacy is always a "privacy" and as a result, some "humbug" was founded upon. This British diplomat Sir Henry Wotton, who lived between the years 1568-1639 as expressed terse: "a diplomat, his country's greatest good to tell a lie for an honest man sent to other countries." Peoples of the States, and this control is limited by the democratic control of foreign policy in the field of less than or the absence of any early modern period, even 20 century, diplomacy, I always had a secret. So, not only against other countries, against their own people was hidden. President Wilson's diplomacy, both internal, external and opposed to the secret execution. Because according to him the secret diplomacy, the role of the First World War, was larger in the process. Wilson's findings of fact, there was some truth. Turkey's First World War, political and diplomatic activities conducted by the Committee of Union and Progress government secretly Wilson right not to recall how the way that it is not possible. If you do not want to live in the First World War and other disasters, not only all political and public diplomacy have to carry out the work clearly. So at first glance, perhaps everyone would say yes, why the need for this transparency obeyed? Why do some state affairs and diplomacy, especially in the privacy of understanding by most people be fulfilled? This is because the "state" related to ascribe meaning. Because the government or public authority created by the people and subject to all the people in a corporate structure addedilmiyor. Because most people, consciously or unconsciously, the state that existed before they were born and they died, then his action will have "a distinct and important" think he is an asset. Kabullenilebiliyor government jobs for his privacy. "State secrets" is called the concept here. Public diplomacy, that is, a state activity, even in the "we" and "them" is an activity undertaken in the context of a more secret, and privacy shield bürünmesi seems to be acceptable.
Wilson action "secret diplomacy" or a "state secret" of all kinds, such as the opening curtain of cannabis in public, all state affairs, including diplomatic activities and any public activity, carried out transparently and defend the obvious. A public institution in a state of diplomatic activity and the state. Public, ie public, the public, the public, belongs to everyone. From here on out: the public secret or confidentiality can not move a thing. Because of the public is the public space, is the clear and obvious. Already the word in English for the public, "public" in the sense of the word "obvious, overt" means. Personal of the individuals belonging to "secret, secret and confidential" may. Because of privacy and personal concerns of the person just mentioned can be considered secret. Public works, so diplomacy, confidentiality should not be. In fact, to some extent it kabullenmiştir contemporary democratic world. Since Wilson is no longer the control of parliaments elected by the people and the public gizlenmemesi diplomacy should have been accepted in principle at least. State archives after a certain period of time to open people's knowledge of the rule is the result of this approach. When Wilson more than a century have passed since the people's sovereignty and democracy that is almost universally accepted as a true WAS, why, and it was still the most democratic countries, even if we encounter the phenomenon of secret diplomacy and state secret? Should belong to the public affairs of state, causing some of diplomatic activity in this context is concealed from the public? It is itself the answer to "safeguard the interests of the people," it said. But this advocacy unfounded, because people know what their interests are protected and does not know how, it can not say that the public interest. In fact, public diplomacy and confidentiality aktivitelerdeki other reason. Why Diplomacy, "we" and "them" distinction. In other words, they are not seen within the scope of the public. This is a kind of international relations as a state of war as a conflict of interest always looking, popular words, "win-win" framework to evaluate the result of an understanding. At the national level "state secret" is not the so-called interests of the people. So what if people know there objection? In fact, the so-called state secret, not public, is the interest of some individuals or stratified. But sekteryen out "state secret" public interest "are concepts such as camouflage. Born of the Republic of Turkey on this issue provides us with enough material. If you look at what you see is described as a state secret, rather than the interests of the community average, you'll find the interests of certain people or stratified sekteryen.
Privacy and the secret policy of no benefit to the whole of humanity, or there is the peoples. Moreover, there is no sense of privacy in the process practical. Because people do in secret, as our self-evident, except those who know something can be done or not done. Indeed, published Wikileaks'in "ifşaatlar" surprise most people. 'We already knew that' the statement said. Just Great Britain and France, and the time to share with other large states, the Ottomans and the desire to break up as it is known before the 1916 Sykes-Picot treaty. Wikileaks gave us the opportunity to confirm what we know. Wikileaks publications as a result of observation and evaluation of most people, the American diplomats also saw how much that is shallow and clumsy. This is only my point of view of international relations contrary to popular belief argümanımın prescribed by the great powers was confirmed. More people in this so-called "diplomatic confidentiality" and "state secret" to Wikileaks and other platforms, we need to be familiar with. Finally, the above args Let me conclude by responding to a question imaginable. The question is: If the diplomatic interests of privacy and the public is not a state secret, and over time, if not practically significant, there is then why? Al answer: to protect the interests of a particular person or stratified temporary sekteryen.
No comments:
Post a Comment