Bribery soruşturmasındaki question marks - Fashion - Style - Trendy

Thursday, December 16, 2010

Bribery soruşturmasındaki question marks

Kayseri "allegations of bribery" with the Attorney General held a press conference in Kayseri on the documents handed out the correspondence between the Ministry of Interior. Atalay is shown as a basis for the opinion of legal documents that the process operated in the new information led to question marks.

Chronologically, this correspondence reveals the correspondence and the 'dark spots' are as follows:

* 2 MONTH BEGAN LATE: Haji Ali Hamurcu running municipality, 17 July 2007, Kayseri Mayor Mehmet Özhaseki and his statement to safety the other managers about the bribery allegations were very serious. Kayseri Attorney General, the Mayor instead of opening an investigation immediately upon Hamurcu'nun expressions Özhaseki and about other suspects "misconduct" charges to allow the investigation referred to the Ministry on July 31, 2007.

However, the Law on Combating Bribery and Corruption 17 According to the prosecution on charges of bribery have to make a direct inquiry. Indeed, 3 September 2007, sent to Ministry ON Başsavcılığa Özhaseki paper and other municipal employees all of the allegations about the crime of bribery, so according to law, the prosecution should be reminded to carry out direct investigations and paperwork was returned.

* Prosecutor JUSTIFICATION: Kayseri Deputy Attorney General Ismail Dalan, on the insistence of the Ministry in response to the Ministry by September 19, 2007 Mayor Mehmet Özhaseki and other suspects on charges of bribery on the reported investigation was launched. Dalan, causing direct inquiries about this article açmadığını suspects also "committed the crime of bribery in the direction of an abstract does not contain any concrete evidence of a direct investigation into allegations regarding the prosecution of public officials Trench compensation would be difficult to cause suffering" felt the need to explain the grounds. 2-month delay of the investigation began.

Not use * RIGHT TO APPEAL: Dalan Deputy Attorney General, however, "the nature of the actions alleged against the possible loss of evidence is necessary and urgent that the collection" of claiming that an administrative prior review in accordance with the Ministry of Interior concluding statement Hamurcu'nun Police insisted. The Ministry sent a letter to Governor of Kayseri on October 4, 2007 in accordance with the insistence of the prosecution's preliminary investigation, the Governor's Office "to cover all issues of complaint" to make a preliminary inquiry and the "opinion of the Governor" nature of preparing asked to send a report. 13 December 2007, according to preliminary research at the Ministry suspicious about the claims made by the Governor's Office regarding "processing konulmama" Kayseri Governor said the decision was given.

Governorate of Kayseri, Kayseri 2 January 2008, the decision processing konulmama Başsavcılığı'na reported. Deputy Attorney General on 1 February 2008, the Ministry Dalan processing konulmama explored the decision, appeal rights and procedures against the law they deem appropriate for the Governor of Kayseri kullanmayacaklarını reported.

* NO LISTENING: Attorney General, conducted the investigation on March 12, 2008 on charges of bribery, "not to prosecute" decided. According to the decision not to prosecute, the owner of the allegations and claims of the Hamurcu dinlenilmiş by the prosecution had again. However, expression of the prosecutor's office Hamurcu'nun between the first and second expression 'contradictions' that, bribery related to the events location, time, and the amounts do not match the first words of the defense. Hamurcu, this second statement after the prosecution applied to express once again and this time the alleged bribe taking back the Kayseri Municipality UKOME Manager Solomon Temeltaş'ın telkinleriyle said bringing the claim language. The prosecution claims the municipality in charge of the suspects, "almost all" the phrase stating that the allegations of bribery in the alleged gas station owners yalanladığına was striking.

The prosecution, as the only expression of the investigation on charges of taking bribes yetinirken CMK'da communication, monitoring and technical follow-up telephone tapping can be done if not using provisions. Decision not to prosecute when there is no evidence in many investigations in the middle path is used to listen to an explanation of why gidilmediğine did not take place. Public Prosecutor, Ministry of the Interior reported on March 13, 2008 decision not to prosecute is granted.

No comments:

Post a Comment