Wikileask, Is the individual the power of the state did the game? - Fashion - Style - Trendy

Sunday, December 5, 2010

Wikileask, Is the individual the power of the state did the game?

Have a rapist or a pawn? State monopoly of stealing information from the public, offering a contemporary Robin Hood Do? Does the cleaning operation, a kind of superpower, the United States, behind Do you have a government or an organization, is a psychological war carried out? The event also great when the questions multiply. So what is all this tainted how to be reached between the values and concepts? Or a washing machine Wikileask?

Wikileaks reveal confidential diplomatic information the United States, a global "problem" has become. The so-called "service" that they reveal information hidden from the public by governments "dangerous" was found. The most natural right to information by the states "most dangerous" in a job being offered to people.

However, for the information revealed by some Wikileaks'ın "There is nothing new," he preferred contempt, while some of them, "Was this the U.S.?" He is a "super power" itself could not contempt.

ITS HARD TO MAKE THE INFORMATION DISSEMINATION

First of all, have to make that determination: The problem is "known" or "acquaintance" is a simple manifestation of interstate relations, but appear to be simple, but concealed this information is then very hard and complex structures, this structure is called the state to be there all the gates breaking or leakage. Infiltration or sızdırılma, this information is "absolutely" considered as a way out of the state does not change the fact.

But the job does not end here, this one also needs to be available to the public. So this so easy? Wikileaks'a intensive attacks in recent days, the founder of the Jullian Assange decided to arrest and death threats, to keep a monopoly on information and technology workers can be seen as interference. Created the political and police repression, as well as overcoming the technological barriers, such as the information is not easy at all to offer with all the nudity, knitted into the basic rights, "legal barriers" to the filter of the media because this information needs to emphasize that he had to. First publication of information in various media organs, the obstacles put in front of a global order of freedom of information is the other expression. So, why all the information in the hands of Wikileaks'ın yayınlamadığını and why in a moment that he had to spend some filters question the need not to underestimate the global order. A leak in the system, does not mean that all of the castle was destroyed.



WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF ASSANGE OR YES?

Information "strong" and her numerous obstacles to get lerden able to present the piece, albeit this time, then inquires about how this was achieved is not surprising to encounter already. Peace, democracy and security relations with each other due to the monopoly of the states, all others accused Wikileaks'ın documents revealed by the states own dirty, dishonest and conspiratorial relationship forward in the eyes exposed. Wikileaks accurate information about the circumstances of politics so polluted that no doubt will not be easy to reach. Every day, the media, public information, pumped for the formation of the desired perception. Do not Have a rapist Assange hero? Only an anarchist or a pawn used by another power do?

Revealing the information, "psychological operations as" evaluating, rejecting claims that the documents published in the arguments put forward is the difference? What is the basis of the charges behind him by the name of any country? What are the reasons that lead to think that a cleaning operation in the U.S.? The conspiracy is a conspiracy, how, for what purpose and against whom is it done?

EVERYTHING IS PLAYING THE CONCEPT OF THE STATE OF A KIND "DELIVERY" STATE OF BEING

Which of these is essential in response to "interrogation" was adopted as the answer to what the effects on the global level today Wikileaks'ın aranırsa interlude is not enough to cover. Where it turns bakılsın, it is not a large operation can not be claimed. This new breakthrough in the world of information, and perhaps more particularly wrong to belittle the situation to steal the door.

Wikileaks'ı Assange'ı or defiance of, the replies to glorify the state and it does not mean surrender? Informed the United States above all to assume that the generated global system that you are invincible, think that people everywhere are watching and have all the information, but also a determination is also expressed in a submission. In this context, it too would be wrong to ask the following question: is a super power "super smart" and "anyone else, above all, superior" to assume the state to glorify him, by Do not ignore the individual?

GLOBAL SYSTEM ONE PER INDIVIDUAL undermine

People forget that they are the founders of all these systems. Underestimated the power of human creativity. Is composed of a single individual or Assange'ın surrounded by complex relationships does not change the fact that state-sponsored. Wikileaks'ın information is revealed today, humanity is a very important positions in the face of the dominant forces won. State inaccessible, indestructible, all-knowing, seeing everything as a mechanism that manages to remain vulnerable in the face of it, purify all the weapons, rather than the entire global system, even a single person needs to believe sarsabileceğine.

STATE stupidity

Yaşanılmaz the world every day we do not have to make the field and being able to own up to the eyes of a semester system, a pile of his own in the "space" and "stupidity" includes. Wikileaks is used by other states or organizations, even if the disclosure of information, then these forces to be competent in the processes that control all questionable.

After that, what is in front of states, such as information barriers to protect their systems öreceği or what kind of measures would take to wait, instead of increasing the number of cracks in the system and open the door at the end of the dam stands as an important task.

No comments:

Post a Comment