Wikileaks'in published documents, and the volume / number, as well as the content and origin of journalism / reporting is an important milestone. Classical / traditional journalism, perhaps 19 Since the century, malumun not notice,''the ruling from public owners / yurttaşlardan deliberately concealed, inspected and assessed the public value of information after a series of bearing is known as''the publication. Because the power (s) against them, especially their attempts to conceal information, it brought about the charge and responsible journalist.
Journalism, public / citizens in the information already in the function, property monopoly on the information in establishing the powers to eliminate this monopoly, information transparency, ie demokratikleştirmektir pluralize.
Wikileaks'ın announced its own Web site aims to serve these goals, and working conditions here.
For the first time in 1972, the Pentagon began to be used in a very limited Internet access for military communications, a full 48 years later, by serving a purpose entirely different and almost completely the opposite, Wikileaks'ın success has become an important tool.
MI Divine Secrets?
Who feels the need to keep what reason?
Perspective and in terms of the ruling class will try to answer this question:
The poor, the dispossessed, the power is cut ezdiği, groups, and citizens there is nothing to hide. They are naturally transparent. The forces of political or economic sphere, for there is a wealth shall protect / gizleyecekleri / enclosure will not make a difference. On the contrary, the current situation because they constantly complain and complain about the victim, call shouting. Excludes inserts are the same as most of the time.
So economically wealthy and / or political power to protect the owners / hide / There is just too much to maintain sufficient levels. The origin of wealth may be controversial. This is to protect the existence of legal or illegal methods may work. In power, and happy. But it must take various measures to make their power and happiness always. This necessity is not to be transparent, and sometimes even murder, to lie require processing. So does the great mid-written and-drawn, all of these negative effects, will admit that information, ideas and not facts. Then you need to hide them. But in the privacy official, legitimate, credible, reliable, convincing justification, must be located on a sheath. That's 'State Secrets', or 'Military Secrets', 'Security Secret', 'Trade Secret' was invented such concepts and phrases so.
Between the State or any kind of organized journalism institution to disclose to hide the basic contradiction in the contradiction between the information. State or corporate power, silence, the journalist explores / research / fact undertaken as a joint function to remove. Completely transparent, politics and all areas of information sharing, truly democratic, independent and a liberal regime, the journalist may open.
Shouting SILENCE
Let us come now Wikileaks documents and echo-reactions.
First published documents, still the world's political, military and economically powerful state in the various capitals of the diplomatic representatives of the United States and some official institutions in the United States consists of hidden-stamped correspondence. Some of these documents probably never yayınlamayacaktı, and some 30 or 50 years after the yayınlanabilecekti.
One state, why hide a document? What kind of hides the documents?
Diplomacy, permanent, stable, unchanging principles, not on the basis of changing interests, the execution of a struggle in bed. Floors, structural as slippery. One state, a policy of a continent, one can apply a policy diametrically opposed to another continent. Diplomatic very large extent, depends on the time and space.
Diplomats, are going only to the tops, so that will remain outside the public's knowledge of the correspondence, of course, much more sincere, more credible information, ideas and opinions are expected to lead forward. These opinions, in fact, U.S. foreign policy 'information'ları insider. That is pure from the inside, naked information. This correspondence with American diplomats in the U.S. foreign policy, especially ruhiyesi Halet-i, the real purpose and intention to be able to read. This Halet-state, imperial pride (regards Said!) Refers to a very simple way. From the hilltop overlooking the other one dismissive, everyone who wants to be dominated by all things, who opposed him / resist (Iran / Libya) against the forces hakarethamiz approaches, Hillary Clinton's 'Human Rights, Peace, Stability, Dialogue' words again, the rhetoric often contradict. Wikileaks documents proving the hypocrisy of U.S. foreign policy is exposed.
And then there is what we need to embrace privacy shield? U.S., legal, legitimate, good, and all documents and applications, already believed to be accurate through the media and flutes and drums (drums clarinet!) And the whole world does duyurmuyor?
Monday and Tuesday on the British, American and French media, I tried to watch. Necessarily be looked at in the Turkish media. Obvious difference between the two once again emerged. Ours is a very narrow issue with a view to take in the framework of Turkish-American relations, in terms of themselves are not aware of the dire situation. Some ministers published a refutation of allele hurry. 3-4 hours later, Clinton was indirectly acknowledged the actual documents. Prime Minister Erdogan's tough, especially the mouth 'Wikileaks döksün especially at the foot of the stones required to disclose then we'll see a' say well tragic. Erdogan also claimed Wikileaks'e güvenilmeyeceğini. Without any concrete information.
Tuesday's newspapers, Clinton apologized wrote Davutoğlu mouth. I am sorry! Clinton made a press conference after talks with Davutoglu. Whom he did not say sorry or something. I just said it was sad. I am sorry!
Televizyonlardaki in the discussions, the ruling pro-people, journalists, analysts, strategists, retired ambassadors should defend büyütmemek event, the documents cited as gossip. They şeylermiş already known. Moreover, these views, perhaps one percent of açıkladıklarında documents released yet. Opposition spokesmen, the 'how to AKP and Erdogan yıpratabiliriz here? "Sought to answer the question.
However, the problem, far beyond the process of a political business cycle, predicts a catastrophic structural in terms of power holders. Wikileaks, tomorrow, Turkish or French, German, Chinese or Iranian state publishes confidential information, what happens? Shell, BP, What happens if Microsoft's confidential information to the Internet?
The problem is, the ordinary / simple percolation / leakage is not the problem. The problem is the concept and practice of secrecy and mystery muştulamasıdır was at an end. The ruling that the owners of each public / community / media / citizen finds out where it reaches the end? Monopoly ownership of knowledge, the powers are taken away, how much of this power may be able to?
Does not claim no one has the right of all documents published by Wikileaks'ın. But having eaten at least until now secret stamp disclosure documents, the information in these documents, serious / action after a rigorous inspection of journalism, deepening, and WANs need to cross-examination. Carry some information in the privacy of documents is not very important. Such information is extracted prior to publication by professional editors. Likewise, the source of information, news or endanger the safety of proper names, place names and time as soon as the news report.
Wikileaks basis of documents / information consists of a large majority of the public interest. Particularly the United States, including citizens, everyone has the right to access to this information.
Diplomatic correspondence, not only in military and commercial correspondence, by any chance, history, our age, Wikileaks Wikileaks Pre-Post will discuss the two different sections. After this scandal will remain secret document written in the chest every diplomat, every soldier, every trade or politician inevitably more rigorous / cautious to act. Maybe even shed a lot of stuff after this post. Especially the computer, the Internet God Bless!
Clinton, Monday's statement, considered to be indirect, while the accuracy of the documents, that information is leaked otantisitesini approving these documents 'illegally seized', 'stolen' claimed. The law if you do you, of course Wikileaks thief. The law if you do you, of course Wikileaks has used illegal ways. Here, the basic question, how these documents leaked or not leaked. Contents of the documents. Documentation of the information, opinions and ideas in order against a legal and legitimate part of the Clinton advocated.
Does the crash site Wikileaks legal and legitimate? 'First, not inconsistent with Amendement'a?
As a result, Wikileaks, the traditional / classical journalism keeps away to die in recent times has been a revolution in terms of the size of the animating NEW GLOBAL JOURNALISM. Also, let's not forget:
No evil can not remain hidden forever. Because nothing can stay hidden forever.
No comments:
Post a Comment