Prof. Inceoglu: Media one-way, from strong powerless, and dictation ediciydi from north to south. Subtracted from the news to us, was dezenforme. Wikileaks'in his anarchistic yes, yes, a new media is coming.
Wikileaks has been a symbol of new media. Available for the first time the media, politics, founded on the power of information opened a door to change. This new media banners that hide the dirty truth that no doubt an anarchistic attitude, so if there is hope to meet a wide range of appreciation and solidarity. Wikileaks'in whether a turning point in the media, what has changed at Galatasaray University faculty members, Professor Faculty of Communication. Dr. We talked with Sally Inceoglu.
Wikileaks event, what exactly is in fact, 'the beginning of the new media Layout, symbol, harbinger Is?
Wikileaks news event, the concept of this event has inflicted almost metamorphism. Although the reason for existence-up to the media a bit utopian-fourth power, as the emergence of a erk purpose of obtaining information hakkıydı completely public. Will give the public service to inform the public, as much as possible aktaracaktı objective truth. However, this feature of globalization is gaining momentum lost automatically.
Why is lost, what is the connection between them?
All the world media in the 1980s, which manages a global scale, 80, 100 şirketken the world in the 2000s is now 8, 10 companies have this power. This is completely horizontal, vertical, cross-monopolization rather say oligopolleşme. Disney, News Corporation, AOL Time Warner, Viacom, General Electric, only to give notice does not work. These weapons, the automotive industry, war industry in the informal sector have a voice in many media. Thus, citizen, citizen of the world is going, because their interests have been violated have the right to information already in other sectors to have the power to own the media want to armaments. So here are the most victimized survivor world public opinion, citizens of the world.
Wikileaks AS TSUNAMI
This imbalance creates inequality in a completely different ...
Yes. One-way, weak from strong, southern hemisphere northern hemisphere. And all three holds the largest news agency in the flow of news: the Associated Press, AFP and Reuters. They want the information to us, Noam Chomsky's phrase "ideological poison" spreading. Dezenforme been subtracted from the news is going ahead or not does not come chipped, hiding from us. Loquat news and communication scheme, since the 1980s, a discussion such as this but nothing has been recovered, in contrast to growing gaps. Enformasyona transport conditions on access to a Ugandalıyla a Türkiyelinin or not equal to an American. One I got this. Politics in the media capital of a very intimate relationship. Whose hand is not clear who's in his pocket. So many, so to speak, a time when relations sergeant dude Wikileaks has made almost a tsunami effect.
This problem of unequal but upset the existing order!
How the Twin Towers attack on September 11 a number of Americans starting their own yaptı'dan üretiliyorsa conspiracy theory, conspiracy theory, many are able to produce about Wikileaks'le. But no one argue See: Wikileaks has created a new media order.
Stateless ULUSSUZ MEDIA
What separates Wikileaks'i other media?
Wikileaks'in ownership structure, mentality. Is not connected to a nation state, a stateless media. Does the media not even being discussed, but he is a crude and global forms of information dealing with the media is conducting a serious relationship. The New York Times, Le Monde, El Pais, The Guardian. These are serious reputable newspapers. Although the New York Times, the father and son were in the Bush administrations always harmony and harmony. 1. The Gulf War, Afghanistan and the occupation of Iraq, about weapons of mass destruction had a bad exam, management almost tried as accomplices have been involved in a propaganda bureau.
They made CRIME PARTNERSHIP
While co-operation to disclose the crimes of the state government for what he now is working Wikileaks'le? New media in the era of the media to be seen?
Feelings of guilt or perhaps you want to confess that I do not know wants to resolve a bit. Solo Listeners forget, opened 3 per thousand of documents, "a change in the wind breeze," I said he could against the argument, "this, or the United States and the New York Times to publish any belgelerse tool if so ..." More or less. Look: The Guardian, Le Monde, El Pais showed a significant posture. Wikileaks acted wisely in publishing the documents, all distributed, so these papers has analyzed the documents, filtered. This is subject to the increased reliability of Wikileaks'in world public opinion, used them as guarantor. This came to work at newspapers, the circulation of them exploded.
Transfer the work to understand the sense of the information already disclosed Wikileaks'in again fell to traditional journalists.
Of course, that because their data-driven journalism, journalism is Wikileaks data. Take the raw information publishing. So the criticism, which he did not journalism. Could not have achieved the purpose of Wikileaks girmeseydi cooperation with the global media.
ANTI HIERARCHICAL anti-authoritarian
This alternative media channel for co-operation of wikileaks'in status, the potential for sabotage or absorb?
Once Wikileak'ın anti-hierarchical, anti-authoritarian has a structure, profit does not carry. Assange'ın also said this: "We want to create a transparent society, will post the information stored from us," he says. Therefore, the publication of these documents, as an example of investigative journalism in today's possible to define a new kind.
Paradigm changes in the media in this way?
I think this is a little early to talk about definitive. This created the effect of an earthquake, people are now diplomats, politicians in this climate, everyone living in the states will be more cautious. Know that it is not so easy anymore to store the information. Omission, defect, corruption and cover up the violations, although eventually emerges and makes a great impact.
LEADER OF CITIZEN journalism
Access to information, the use of information, namely that the information that is those who have the power of the media capital of the state general readers in terms of public relations Wikileaks is a beginning, a new media order miladıdır could say?
Yes. This event is the beginning of a new media order, we can declare as Gregorian. Because the traditional media that we call the media, unfortunately, does not perform the task. Out of someone's traditional media, your mission is, why do not you do it so long you look, we've done here, so this job is done, say, had to pass in front of her. In this sense, Wikileaks is a kind of traditional media, citizen journalism, and for pioneering the beginning.
What is meant by citizen journalism, citizen information goal, is the source?
Commonly used Internet terminology confusion experienced during this period. Said there is a difference here. Both also said that Turkish but in English there are two different terms. English, a "civic journalism" have a "citizen journalism." What we call citizen journalism, for example, elections in Iran, Madrid bombings, the tsunami in Indonesia last reporting the news out to the world through events such as Twitter mean to be the source of the public. Here are the news source, you produce the news. But news of civic journalism'de producing a professional journalist, makes the public interest journalism.
Hopefully MONOPOLIES INFORMATION
Social networks in the world, the number of people using new media, conventional media incomparable with what we call the media so much. 500 million in Facebook, Twitter has more than 160 million users. In Turkey, the number 24 million on Facebook, Twitter user of 3 million 27 million. However, the sum of 4.4 million daily newspaper tirajının. All newspaper tirajlarından 6 times more.
If you think that Turkey's population of 75 million is a figure of close to 30 million. One-third. This is the number of newspapers per thousand people still rubbing the 60s show. The criteria to join the EU in the newspaper to drop a hundred thousand people could not achieve its goal. Turkey oral culture, written culture, society, culture and audiovisual Can not encountered in the 1980s at a time, act together to give ourselves, got to see this as an opportunity to özeleşti. But of course this is not just a problem unique to Turkey, the world's problem.
U.S. wants to hide information on the Internet this information is lost, and again spread over the internet ...
Here, the thing is certain: knowledge monopolies is no longer broken. Knowledge of this power in the hands of those who, from time to time used in abuse of power. Now, transparency, transparency is experiencing a breaking point. Public sphere of knowledge is important here. Wikileaks has made it. Acted as a carrier and the world: "Look, this is reality, we share this world public opinion," he said. Here, of course, there is an anarchist movement, "This can change the world," it said. "It's possible to change the layout, we do not want this layout, this is a resistance, this is an attitude, that we are putting ourselves in this regard and are hopeful, optimistic. Because we have the power to change it, "it said.
INFORMATION POLLUTION NARKOTİKTİR
New media, the public should know the very important and indispensable in terms of uncovering hidden. But this new power will not be a new power tool or the security of your personal information will be provided, how the law protected the right of people vague. The new term will be a chaotic period?
Here, with so much excess information pollution information comes into play. It extracts, filtering, "threshold guardians" of the lie, rumor, gossip and public curiosity gıdıklamaktan rather than separating the real world of Information is very important to observe the public interest. Because so much information, and the influence of drugs is doing is creating pollution. A lot of the information described in this magazinsel something. But sorting out the information about nuclear weapons is important. This information to start work here, those who use forms of information is entering.
Already there are an incredible speed and precipitation.
In this century, very impatient people, you want to compact everything. Such as the pill. Even so besleneceğiz allow this type of a diet already, for it does not want to lose time or something. It also difficult for traditional journalism. Wikilieaks "I'll give crude forms of information," he says. The biggest responsibility here that the world public opinion to break the monopoly of information, we share with you, those who say. Now that you gözetiliyor public interest and a more democratic world, then the correct use of information and confidence required sarsmamaları.
Who will oversee WİKİLEAKS'İ?
That trust, trust us, disguised as a prerequisite for the information they offer is already on. But it looks as if a gap of more later: Yes, now published these documents, etc., A step which holds the information after the new case is now in power there will be a focus of power and who can guarantee that there would be a new power structure?
Here you enter into obligations of conscience. Everything is by law is not law. You make an issue of leadership, a revolution, and are starting a movement, if any, that a manifestonuz have wikileaks'in, we want to free press, they say are not satisfied with the layout of the existing media-dragging behind you hunt you how many million people, of course, up to million people that the eyes on you will be looking at whether you are behind your word. We supervise them. Here you are talking about a citizen force. There is a global movement of citizens, you contend that you are his leader, you will also, so that citizens do not have the luxury of quitting midway. Wikileaks'in controllers will be citizens.
I think this will be even stepped in: Wikileaks'le many people bearing the same responsibility, to block and sabotage the stages of the site wikileaks'e tripped, the mirror served as copying the contents of the site, after the support meetings, demonstrations were all over the world.
Also was arrested Assange kapılanlar despair, but no, it is no longer something to be prevented. They will do in this control. I am very happy for myself, I'm hopeful. Become cautious, however, still think that waiting benefit.
Politicians NOW THEY SANSÜRLEYECEK
Printing press to spread the information provided ucuzlamasını proliferation. Internet access is much faster than a more massive scale, and this ... New media power in a concrete block in any location, not scattered all over the world point to point quickly duplicate and distribute information. The use of knowledge can be said that we have entered a period of more democratic?
Sure. Previously, vertical, top, top-down dictation Killer had a layout. Now, more than the horizontal sharing of democratic participatory media is dawning. Very important part of participating in different, in terms of their own voice duyuramayanlar. Alternative of the importance of the media here. Marjinalleştirdiği traditional media, they are even excluded sectors. Because the traditional media on a global scale and national scale, a "we" are the definition of. WASP in the United States as it passes. White, Anglo-Saxon Protestant. We have a "Muslim, Sunni, heterosexual, secular, conservative," he passes. In addition, the other ones. Because of this mindset is the mindset that have dominated the media. This is called Louis Althusser, the ideological state apparatus works as the media. Existing hegemonic, re-production of the dominant discourse, meşrulaştırılmasında takes a very serious task. Wikileaks-type blocks of this type of social media mecrasında Therefore, to reduce the effect of exclusions. Ecologists, homosexuals, minorities will be the voice of others, what is beautiful.
SOCIAL MEDIA IN SEARCH OF CONVENTIONAL MEDIA
Through these networks of people at a power of social media örgütlenebilmesi immediately. Haydarpasa fires natural appearance, and then immediately organized a protest. TV was not required for this newspaper.
Hears the sound of the need for Already duyuramayacaktı because almayacaklardı mainstream media coverage.
And now the news is doing the production of the event itself, the production of social media, the action that produced the event, the conventional news media that the event is there to follow up!
Exactly. He commented on whether the news of the incident. I have it already in the Wikileaks case. Conventional media dışlanmadı ultimately, cooperation began, except for kalamayacağı. I also have a heart that is now! This brought up in front of your eyes sokmuşlar, this is a point gelemeyecekleri no longer be ignored. To stay in the conventional media have had to develop this attitude.
HEADS OF STATE OR 'Tweets
This new media is changing the media will inevitably change, the politics of change?
I do not know will not change the political climate changes, a little early, but the more cautious politicians no longer have to be more cautious. Maybe it will go into oblivion, but rumors have to change the behavior of politicians, politicians will have to censor themselves for the news sansürleyemeyecekleri.
President of the Republic that it had pulled his head ... Social media and public over the heads of state began to connect.
Social media is also very important for politicians to connect the public over the weapons, the people you care first of them, "the man" instead of message do you put it, the President of Venezuela government channel (Channel 8) on the Alo Presidente (Hello President) to listen to the people of the live broadcast once a week Once a regular basis. Now, this requires our time, the state father, the citizen used as slaves once tended to stay behind.
MORE JOURNALISTS politicians chummy
A new media to communicate his supervisor, the global media, talking to national media will not rest. How do you think of the media situation in Turkey?
Turkish media to understand the process of the 1980s neo-liberal policies have to look at the drop trace. Bab-i Ali Bağcılara taşınanbir this process. Press into an instant corporate media networks, in glass vase, news from the city, has become isolated from society. Neo-liberal policies had brought the decisive rising values. Profitability, short way to turn the corner from literature, dominance and depolitization of September 12 have brought.
After the liberation of flight from Turkey magazinel discourse community has found this process. Politics should not talk unless spoken entered. The Press of capital, the bosses have changed. Simaviler, Karacanlar people from different sectors in a period of days went from father to son, "I've got money, the media, the owner might be strong I will be entering politics atılacağım perhaps use other sectors," he began a period. This is a metamorfozdu. Because our people the right to information which was ultimately. Mass media is the lack of self control, disposal of cases of social responsibility, media, politics and capital relations have witnessed fıkılığına tight. The media-political relations in a very complex problem to be had from the beginning of each semester, the politicians had at least one media. For example, a love hate relationship with politics, the media were assessed during Turgut Ozal. Journalists entered the politicians too chummy relations, has been a lot of connections to Ankara. Columnists spree began. Was Taboos, konuşulmadı Kurdish problem, no critical yaklaşılmadı soldier. Çıkaramadı sounds too much inconsistent. Was serious pressure on governments to the media.
Politicians, the media, to power the sound is actually a mutual interest in a cause çıkaramamasının was not to be entered into the relationship, a job he does not see the dirty work came hallettirirken another media ...
Sure After all the media "status quo" came to define the line. Iktidarlara was always close to the mainstream media and, unfortunately, are often made their spokesman.
Keeping REPORTER POSITION IS THE NATIONAL INTEREST
How do you find the last term of derogation on the media?
I care about the existence of that Party, Turkey has different media, from time to time made a mistake. Blood have a built in Turkey, which I think is wrong. It has to advocate for national interest, such as newspapers, there is an expectation, this expectation in both politics and there yurttaştan. However, as journalists, is not advocacy of national interest. Treason Should not saying. But the journalist is to observe orunda benefit "state interest" and not "public interest" is the first.
AUTHORS NEWS OPINION NOT REPRODUCTIVE
How do you find news and reviews for newspapers?
Correspondents all over the world are very important but not worth much here, unfortunately. Too many authors write, and seven days a week! Nowhere in the world does this. Some of them, the idea does not produce any corner of the news do enter into a relationship odağıyla siyasiyle power. Or eften püften, one does not wonder, does not need things or write your own özellerini.
I had SpeakIt sexuality MISSION
Former editor of Hürriyet, Ertugrul Ozkok "sit-com journalism" of the future of journalism and Ayse Arman claimed to be the incentive for it had been proclaimed pioneer. Ozkok people liked it, you dig, he said.
People want it to say we are giving a lot of populist rhetoric. Of course, this kind of news readers read with curiosity a part, this is a "type of journalism is not a" I'm not saying at, not for me to say this, this 1980 post-gusto, pleasure, pleasure is a part of the teaching of culture to people from Turkey is a table resulting in my opinion. Türkiyelilere to live a little bit of teaching, sexuality konuşturabilme easily, such as skipping class is a kind of missionary journalists have stripped the people of Turkey in the media, but in reality there are many different problems. What to do by doing it the real journalists do not do this: the narcotic effect of such talent to hypnotize people to do more than useless, as well as journalists to make news in itself is much more than me I am a centrist.
No comments:
Post a Comment