Fashion - Style - Trendy

Wikileaks explaining the hidden mysteries of the United States every day, took delivery of world public opinion. World, America's hidden secrets is not a journalist, a hacker, learn an internet pirate. Rapidshare WikiLeaks'in according to founder, "Mr. Leak" a revolutionary nicknamed Julian Assange. A hero. Şaydamlaştırdı World politics. Changed the course of history. Defied the United States alone, and made fun of super power.

According to an anarchist Rapidshare. More harm than good has come out on a mission to rescue the world. How değiştirtiyse Sept. 11 terrorist attack the world, then world WikiLeaks'ten be the same. Time to show it.

But how accurate the publication of these documents? Informed in all areas of public opinion in favor of a journalist, of course. But the important difference is in favor of the informed. Julian Assange, took possession of this confidential information is correct, do not ever have the wrong filter offers passes to the public. Let such an investigation, what these documents even if he does not know exactly what it says. Because it is not possible to read hundreds of thousands of pages.

Assange the information contained in these documents does not consider how they affect the world public opinion. To disclose the secrets, betrayal, even if there are rules. This rule is not to handle at the top of the source of income. But even if the source of Assange and betrays not recognize any rule. Also "all information should flow freely to the public under the name of doing. Do you have need of the public do not have all of this information, no important arzetmiyor.

WikiLeaks U.S. secret documents made public every day through what is right, not in knowledge of what is unfair. This is written from left to right many of the diplomats gathered, made up of subjective opinions. Information which leads to doubt the objectivity and accuracy. It is true that everything is by the documents, does not mean ispatlıdır. Many of these are correct, many of them may be incorrect.

For example, no risk of confidential documents, not in terms of Teflon pans for Merkel, Prime Minister Erdogan called for the narrow world view. German Foreign Minister Westerwelle arrogant and aggressive. Italian Prime Minister Berlusconi, macho, French President Sarkozy, the naked king. Putin's alpha male. Russia sold the weapons the PKK. Turkey had helped al-Qaeda. Iran's Arab leaders wanted to shootings. Prime Minister Erdogan's secret accounts in Switzerland had a ... So is this correct? Unknown. But this information to the public perceives as right.

Which one's right, which the survey was wrong, this filter passes the information to present to the public, public lighting, but serves to deceive.