Ocalan `s request to determine the output of a single process that connects Prof. Dr. Sea Country Arıboğan, `he said` Now is time to self-criticism.
Arıboğan; `Government has launched its move towards a self-criticism, they ask for the account, the account is given. The PKK and the Kurdish movement in the dirt turn and did not yet own in the `he said.
All the world `s published by WikiLeaks last week in Turkey, such as the documents said. The contents of the documents, and how it is obtained from all week, we discussed what can be taken. And we will continue the discussion in the coming weeks. WikiLeaks documents the multiplicity of documents belonging to Turkey, Turkey `s important to show that an ordinary country.
Turkey WikiLeaks documents Baydemir `e` s next for the description of the previous weeks, with Ocalan, the Kurdish writer Orhan Miroglu also discussed the threat of `open on to. Explanations for Ocalan `a` to remain silent with Turkiya Miroğlu output. The custody of violence once again raised the debate on the Kurds. Many tartışılmasa, the Kurdish PKK / violence are serious problems on a ward. Item of the agenda at an RPP. CHP in the December 18 conference are to yenilenemsi `s` ta PM. Kılıçdaroğlu launched on November 3 in the leadership wants to clinch the war in December 18 `. Let's achieve this?
Interview-comment in this week's Board of Trustees member of Bilgi University Professor. Dr. Sea Country Arıboğan talked with the three topics. Says it's time for the severity of the Kurdish self-criticism Arıboğa; WikiLeaks for certified, `layout` global nudist camp began, he said.
Abdullah Ocalan declared before the election until the end of inertia. Then it threatened to March 1 `a taking, why?
Abdullah Ocalan in parallel with changes in the approach of showing the state `s attitude. The main objective of the initiative is currently in the process of negotiations, it seems, and keep their hands to prevent the formation of a solution which excludes him. Çıkaranlardan also does not like the sound from outside, except for his knowledge of close-growing. At this point the most important factor is seen to undermine him, the organization will keep control of power in the hands not of the opinion formation. Using the powerful and to be able to maintain the appearance and use of property on behalf of the `violence` on the one hand the power is still the state itself, on the other hand some of their initiatives is to show to the public. For example, before taking the decision of inaction, the date is announced, and then changing the date, the following contingent liabilities as if he extends the violence that threatens to begin.
Change Date of the threat of such a show of force?
I define the expression `in` process change the course of history, in fact. Government pre-election terror in the `leave` will force the message allows you to start again. In fact, the introduction of KCK `s in the handler and the mild stresses that it is possible to launch the process of urban action. The final point in this process, and now approached the stage of completion. Parties in the hands of whatever it is ready to open.
ÖCALAN ONLY WANT TO BE DETERMINE
Then out of the Ocalan `s` e Osman Baydemir, `message` Is my only resort?
As I said a little before entering into the process and its actors outside of itself does not want to take an independent initiative. Only those who are not politically forward, TAC, is also very responsive to those who act without orders from him as Bahoz. A large structure such as the PKK, what if you do not block the development of elements moving independently in time. Not concern us at the peace process in Turkey only. World balance of the Kurds in Turkey's own Kurds and the region with a very significant relationship. As long as too much intervention from the outside. The worst thing in terms of Ocalan, the movement fragmented image. I think I was prepared to take the attitude Baydemir other independent political actors through the message was given to the public. The PKK's largest luxury to possess a monopoly on the illegal use of violence. This is frightening in terms of civil and unprotected actors and obedience is certainly compelling. Develop such an environment is already objected to.
BDP, VIOLENCE AGAINST THE POOR
Ocalan `s output of the BDP, a strong opposition to civil politics why not perform?
BDP `s not in the hands of an armed force against oppression koyabilecek armed, also about the management of Ocalan in a proximity and not a single idea. Different ideas have come together under the same umbrella. Moreover, a huge state of dealing with the PKK, a clarity about when the owner, entered parliament representing the people of the region to be within the expectations of these individuals and more than a dream, as well as unfair. On the back of their load, herkesinkinden heavier. Both for his strong stance against the people of the region, and the state, as well as full support of the global powers should. Individual başkaldırışlar the means for each of the hazard. An obligation to remain in a stand at the moment in terms of collective security.
Osman Ocalan Baydemir potential for danger?
Let me ask the question for whom? Depending on what you define as a danger. Sometimes no hot weapon in the hands of a non-politician, a bomb terrorists can create a lot more impact. Gandhi such an identity. Baydemir an elected politician, Ocalan is a terrorist begun the process of political identity. Want your name, baby killer, let's head or divisive, irrelevant. Currently the most important actor in the peace process. Both of them need to evaluate the best ideas on the future of Turkey.
Returning to the interview process. Ocalan `more intimate than the AK Party government says, what does that mean?
Ocalan, the state with the AK Party thinks different things. MIT `s probably the state's bureaucratic mechanism, the soldier, the attitude of the police, a separate assessment of the attitude of the cabinet. And extensions of the PKK in the region `s biggest political rival, the AK Party, let's not forget it. Obligation of public accountability because the government bureaucrats could be so calm and rational thinking can not act. If the AK Party on this issue inevitably followed by a fluctuating course. Is not possible to resolve the issue clearly and sharply. Have severe psychological trauma on both sides. Government against all responsible to Turkey. Moreover, Ocalan, the bonds of their own to keep in touch with the mass represented by `` tide comes in attitudes. Who let the balance is heavily damaged.
BDP `FROM DE KUŞKULANIYORLAR
Is the PKK and the Kurdish politics raises the bar? `` I mean to the region of Kurdistan, near the elected mayors in some initiatives, such as `assign` s co-president ...
Denmesi the Kurdistan region is not new, it has always been something of their jargon. Co-Chairperson of the assignments, and individual outputs to control the size of BDP `purposeful cut the front of the other dimension of the right shift in the political arena is no longer legitimate çalıştıklarının indicator. If you make a different reading of the selected people, and therefore not trust the people of the region in an effort to appoint his own men that they can also tell from the top. So, the BDP `t enough, they feel, trying to intercept a fragmentation. Plus does not believe in polls, hold their own initiatives in the foreground.
What will happen in the future?
I believe the start of a normalization process. Improvement in the situation resolved as soon as possible but can be balanced. It should be no longer tired of everyone. Not suffering, injury, left the period of this terror. But the state has launched its move towards a self-criticism, they ask for the account, the account is given. The PKK and the Kurdish movement in the turn and did not yet own in the dirt. This blood-fed idiyse whoever, I hope that one day give account.
SOLUTION TO THE TERMS SÜRECİNDEYSEK self-criticism
In other words, the politics of the Kurdish self-criticism to do?
Of course to do. Uncritical political movements find their own route.
It can? It is a web site close to the new writer Orhan Miroglu PKK was clearly a threat. It is a powerful voice against the Kurdish politics did not like ...
If you can girilecekse a peace process, of course. Orhan Miroglu `of course, unacceptable and disproportionate to the threat of the situation. But the PKK `s claim of being a democratic organization, were also couldn 't we? Earlier in the skill of its exhibited suppression of different voices. An organization that uses terror as a method, the power is violence. At this moment I do not want a cracked voice. Moreover, there are all kinds of provocation or an open ground. However, leave to one side a strong voice, I think there is incredible, even bold initiatives.
CHP Forgot ROLE OF ACTORS
Barnes also went before the CHP, now collected on December 18 `ta conference. What is a change in the CHP or something else?
Change who performs much, who wants to have to look at. This demand came to the floor, the ceiling was passed to the action. Given the ideological basis of certain boundaries of the CHP and the door of her power could not offer an image. This is an opposition party stuck in the band patterns of molds by 20-30%. However, the power challenge, if necessary, change the democratic structure essential for the existence of a force. Surprises may be pregnant as a result of the convention, I still can not be sure.
CHP can be an actor in solving the Kurdish issue?
CHP's attitude to this problem in recent years has been a distance. However, once the solution of this problem that they believed that it is possible, with the initiative. Prepares reports of Kurdish, Kurds and a party in the alliance do not hesitate to speak of. And it made on behalf of Turkey's future, even loss, even going to see. The CHP, the Kurdish question has already forgotten about the role of an actor but an actor. The PKK started as a left-based post-nationalist, a motion moved etnikçi line. The first approach is the core of the theory and anti-feudal, class against the positions, rights and freedom, the quest is hosting. But it left the base expression is different from a fascist approach in the exhibition, naturally different. The CHP, in case of the Kurds to reach out, this is a task.
IN THE KURDISH Kılıçdaroğlu TEKIN
Change at the CHP is connected to the search for solution of Kurdish problem?
Specifically relevant to this problem but I can not say that in general can be explained within the framework of presenting a new look to Turkey. This is a new paradigm in the evaluation of the Kurdish problem to say. I am a new approach to this issue that one of the changes at the CHP would be, I think. Thompson is a leader of Kurdish origin and the second man Kılıçdaroğlu Gursel, too. This is already a landmark. This situation can be used as a weapon against them, but they also convert the advantage of this. We have clear data, the referendum effort to resolve the issue of the Kurdish people of Turkey The person in the process of emergence. Have developed a new rhetoric in this regard I think of the MHP `.
CHP IN THE SECULAR AND PARTY ANTI-BDP
Is the BDP project alliance is a CHP-realizable?
This project managers with the presence of the CHP refused to say first. Student Award so that it be brought up is very difficult. Because of this, a subject can be used against Kılıçdaroğlu management. I do not think this issue will show a rapid change in the structure of the delegates. But I think it would be theoretically possible and meaningful. Both parties to `Socialist International member. But not yet a full member of the BDP, there. Political approaches to describe in the left. In addition, the issue of secularism is similar to the attitude of both parties. BDP is a bit more temperate communities, but the enemy has an understanding of secularism. Both the AK Party sees good competitor. Therefore, an alliance of this kind may be the loss of votes, also gains. I also have to remember that the AK Party in the elections can turn into a very strong obligation for all parties coming in and alliances. We can see the other alliances.
CHP can play OF DP Door
For example ...
There may be a place of articulation of the Democratic Party `. Apparently there are not many left-right discrimination in a number of issues gaze. Ilhan cutter until his resignation earlier included the CHP to olabilmişti, now general secretary of the party to be flour Süheyl Batumi `meaningful I think. Both names are mentioned for the center-right leadership and the CHP could I be there. I think the electoral alliance between the two parties would not be very difficult. MHP alliance with some smaller parties are allowed.
BDP may enter an alliance with independent from the PKK?
BDP, traveled to Turkey from the PKK and to come close to the CHP, I believe. Recent events show might walk away from a show that large segments niteliğindedir, perhaps the fact. In any case, this indicates that the BDP will change the perception of `the general public. Although this is the case in view of the decision to move away from Imrali, if taken in an independent case. Inertia is prolonged after the election the BDP `s decision may be easier to make an alliance with the CHP. BDP in the resumption of terror against it `s capable of an output I do not think too hard. Then I would imagine the alliance.
Wikileaks is a political DESIGN DOCUMENTS
WikiLeaks `Did you cover or a step in transparency yaynladığı documents?
This shows the need for a very long deep philosophical discussion. Sometimes even the top cover up something açtıkça. This information overload information pollution, it also leads to a major. I say that the age of blur. We do not know what is and is living in a time of manipulation. Communities and individuals are better prepared for this era state devices and have developed their own protective mechanisms, I think. There are many mechanisms pisletebilecekleri mess in their hands and once we have the capabilities that we are asking questions. I used to try to discover the truth with your mind, today sokarlarken our eyes, what will the opposition, what the `lie in this document, he accused düzmecedir` We do not know we will. `` Get the clarity you are compiling, opened not know what to say `this order on behalf of the` global nudist camp, stripped not only of ourselves we will not be noticed.
First, in Iraq and Afghanistan and now in the diplomatic correspondence of the output images. Documents the true?
Documents to be true, does not destroy the fact that they were manipulated. Take a vegetable soup, remove from inside out just tomatoes, can give the impression that it was a tomato soup. Carrots, potatoes are not even visible. Here, too, made o. Both documents sürülüş market order, and is described in which documents are worthy of study. Moreover, some people make on behalf of some of xxx write clearly suggests that serve a purpose. There are allegations of money on the deal. Assange `s` in the very objective that WikiLeaks even think of that, he sızdıranların package store some information, some of the stickers is also very possible to forward. In my opinion, there is a design in the middle politically.
Do these materials consists of notes of U.S. foreign policy?
Foreign policies of countries in the world post comments in documents that clearly if you'd U.S. Secretary of State, they used to call the U.S. `s delusions of the world for guidance. But now I think that they are confident because they were stolen. Theft is not reassuring to become interesting? I think the documents are packaged and transferred, the facts in this regard. Already in the United States has accepted the reality. But I do not know whether it is in the aktarılanların true, they just claim. Need to prove the accuse, not convicted.
TWO-SIDED doubt
3 of these documents is a source of may be the country? For example, the Israeli ...
I do not like this kind kolaycılıklardan no. Moreover, our politicians do, I find the hands of the wrong to tell without evidence seriously. `Assange why I'm hiding in the UK?` I'd ask.
Someone does that protect Assenge `t?
Supported by someone at the exact, how we decide that it is a state management? Maybe some non-state actors are involved. `In the shadow of Israel itself is too large, no longer need to put an end to that approach. Let's not exaggerate.
The resulting documents of U.S. representatives at the AK Party in Turkey to have a suspicious eye. Why?
Also suspicious of the AK Party has a look to the USA, no need to gocunmamak. Our perception of judges at U.S. foreign policy and foreign policy strategy of the government to contradict the perception of the world. However, neither in Turkey nor in the United States do not have a single opinion. For example, in Iran or in our relations with the United States in many different ways of thinking can assume that the AK Party. By a segment of the U.S. `s` Davutoglu sevilmediği not a secret at all, but just last week, a thinker of the year prize awarded to him in any other sector. Let's not ignore them....
No comments:
Post a Comment