Hacettepe University Institute of Ataturk Principles and History in collaboration with the Head of Research Center "in 87 of the Constitution of the Republic and the Foreign Policy Debate on" The scientific meeting was held at Hacettepe University, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Hall.
Of the meeting, "The Constitutional Debate" session was the head of department head Sami Selcuk, the Constitution should be to gain awareness of the society said, wanted to deal with these issues, especially constitutional lawyers.
12 September 2010, constitutional amendments, voted in a referendum that the citizens vote without knowing what was going polls suggesting Selcuk, "the votes of people who do not know what the outcome was voted. No one deceive himself. Oylarsak things we do not know, do not know the results, we may be forced to endure," he said.
Speaking at the session of Istanbul University Faculty of Law Assoc. Dr. Jamie Burnett in the big part of the community agree on changing the Constitution is available in Turkey, but discussed the issue of how to make this change, he said.
Burns, "Today is an ideal, permanent, institutional construction of a new constitution, the constitution of all sections of society to be able to feel discriminated in the process, must embrace all sections of the constitution," he said.
Burns, 50 to 10 years after the regulation will not require a new constitution needs to be done, said: "My suggestion, on how to change the Constitution, amended Article 175 of the Constitution, the Assembly will consist of 12 June 2011 general elections as a result of the new Constitution will be 'the Constituent Assembly as' the adoption, the public announcement of general elections and the formation of this axis, "he said.
To do this, proposing the withdrawal of 10 per cent threshold level of reasonable Burns, will consist of "Constituent Assembly" should be submitted to a referendum on the constitution will be re-expressed by the "referendum, such as 60-65 percent of the new constitution be adopted with a majority, the constitution is not accepted if this ratio is not reached "brought the proposal.
"Everyone should have a say"
Jamie Yanık'ın Sami Selcuk's proposal to attend said:
"This is who the constitution to do it? I am a lawyer, the name 'constituent assembly' happens, the following happens, this happens. Representing all segments of society, an organ, do I believe that a unifying constitution. All parties there that last about 1 per cent should have. The trade unions, civil society organizations, government organizations, the judiciary, all of them should have a say.
History repeats itself I do not. Can pull down to 5 percent electoral threshold, less than 5 percent of the votes of people who vote for parties that do not have a voice in the constitution? You have to find the formula. Remove this constitution must necessarily make a new constitution and the constitution of this new body that will make sure that what we have to specify.
This Constitution is lying to people on the street constantly. This is not separation of powers in the Constitution, no one deceive himself. Event.php how do you use? Önününe from the menu, 'all eat dinner' she says. One can not draw even one. 15 There are many candidates as it is, will you vote for. So who chooses the candidates, the general president chooses. You choose the general president's deputy. So the president's deputy general manager of the human free? Me 'Why the judicial organ of the Parliament member selection' they asked. He is chairman of the nation when the people would choose, but the president's attorney general is not the time. Because some of the judicial body to elect, the people elect the leader of the mark. Would you trust such a judge? I do not trust. "
Sami Selcuk, Head of the Supreme Court in 1999, said during the opening of judicial jurisdiction, "the judiciary, the executive since the 1982 Constitution is under siege" in the words of today, it often brings the language to express, "He applauded when told, now angry," he said.
Selcuk, indicating that the errors of the judiciary, "If the judiciary is a good time out the Supreme Court tried 20 thousand files? Often chewed the independence of the judiciary in Turkey. There is no democracy, public opinion, one does not sound. Public opinion in this democracy where tighter, a place as play, "he said.
Selcuk said Turkey should find a way to make a new constitution, said:
"In this regard, created a public, non-governmental organizations must come with it. Turkey must set up all over again. No other choice but. I no longer want to live in such a Turkey. I want to live in a beautiful Turkey. The Constitution delivered to people in such a Let's face it, not, according to them. It's create an institution that those who sacrifice to keep in this constitution. If the 'constituent assembly' telling a condition is established, this task almasınlar state constitution, those who for 10 years. I get up to do according to their own constitution. "
No comments:
Post a Comment