The display is this: what happened to Julian and his team may come Assange, 250 thousand-odd Wikileaks'in began to share with the whole world does not escape from the document. Because of this essentially non-journalist team, spread across the planet is an important part of the 4 basic language newspaper and a magazine four broadcast is sent to all of them.
The publisher's independence, dignity, devotion and respect of professional considering, would anticipate that more of the document surfaced.
That today's ideas about the backstage world of international relations, American diplomats who disclose their way of thinking and study, we observed that the internal affairs of many countries, including the documents containing the allegations and who No matter what, there is a blessing for journalists.
But there are concerns in the picture. USA, UK, Germany and Spain as countries where press freedom in democratic constitutions sound very large, but the documents are "touched" that is not the same situation in many countries. Wikileaks'e blocked access to more than 15 countries, most of the press, the news filtered for their meşrebi and concerns.
Wikileaks, choosing a publisher, only the "drive to the journalist," the document to extract a dispassionate and communication between trusted.
To date, none of the five publishers, it will shake the confidence of a significant falsoya not fallen. Reasonable ones and taking into consideration the demands of their government, "top secret" damgalıları ayıkladılar; names most of the damage to people he did not see it.
Information with other countries, the media gossip, rumor and will distinguish data; responsible journalism instead of political bias does not have much capacity to highlight the better understood. Especially in Turkey, selected, combative journalism in a part of the political fights karartılarak fed, already damaged, the "neutrality" image has more damage.
Each country has occurred in response to a reader.
Especially in the U.S., according to the other four relatively "shy," the New York Times, a publication, a very tough "you are selling land," reads the response style was the subject. Bill Keller, editor of the newspaper's general manager and editor Jill Abramson mesailerinin separated to give an important part of the aggressive response to questions.
One sentence summed up everything in their response to pile up. "What right, and on whose behalf yayınlıyorsunuz them?" See Keller asks a reader wrote: "to publish them, this democratic country, people should know what the government would recognize a right of veto."
British publication The Guardian and the Spanish El Pais's general director, Alan Rusbridger and Javier Moreno gizlememekte joys. Because of these two newspapers' digital planet, "the two most common high-hit area of language, reputable sources of information. But more importantly, in both - quite rightly - Wikileaks after the event is taking shape rapidly aware of a brand new journalism.
An era closes. Digital journalism, transparency, demanding and technical facilities, in front of us heralds new horizons. From Knowledge to harder escape. Information yataylaşıyor data sharing. Such goes the citizens of the world demands rise dramatically. Wikileaks go, instead of the others will come.
But responsible, principled, never gonna change, the need for fearless journalism.
No comments:
Post a Comment