Kumi Naidoo, head of Greenpeace, the new anonymous. And 15 years in prison in the Republic of South Africa who fought against the underlying Apartheid'a African activist, educated at Oxford Üniveristesi'nde Political Science.
euronews:
Kumi Naidoo, hello and welcome to euronews'e.
Kumi Naidoo:
Thank you.
euronews:
World Climate Summit 16th began in the city of Cancun, Mexico.
The general belief is of no consequence çıkmayacağı in the direction of the talks in 2010. Highlights the urgency of the climate problem here in Copenhagen lost their importance?
Kumi Naidoo:
Copenhagen continues to be felt throughout the world, this sense of urgency. Does not give much importance to the urgency of the situation was, unfortunately, politicians.
Even if only the events of our world live in 2010 on the future of their children and grandchildren enough to show the poker playing.
euronews:
After eight draft text study in Copenhagen, United States President Barack Obama, and advised to reach an agreement between Chinese Premier Wen Jibao'ya. But they are not using this opportunity.
Kumi Naidoo:
China and the United States has been under a great responsibility. I think the negotiations and must reach a conclusion. China took over the responsibility of the U.S. government for a long time, but we can not go more in the long run this game for sure.
If we have a look because of what happened in China, the importance given to the urgency of the situation we see that it is far below our expectations. However, throwing a lot of positive steps need to be stated here.
United States of America when it comes to Copenhagen,
the amount of carbon emission reduction by 2020 to 3 percent found in the direction of commitment.
euronews:
1990 rates, according ...
Kumi Naidoo:
I think this situation is in their interest to show the United States, China and other countries need to encourage.
euronews:
What do you mean saying to encourage?
Kumi Naidoo:
We need two things to play in the dynamics from the United States. Mobilize the American public need to get me through. The union executives, directors of NGOs and religious leaders in different parts of civil society such as we yoğunlaştırmalıyız çağrılarımızı.
The most surprising aspect of the situation in the American intelligence agency CIA and the Pentagon, the Ministry of National Defense, responsible for climate changes that you feel about themselves. And the biggest obstacle to peace and security in the future climate changes that you think would be.
In other words, some segments of public opinion can provide more emphasis on movement dynamics. But it is very difficult to do this and hide from you. But what if possible should be done to achieve this goal.
Emitting fossil fuel use in the United States millions of dollars to influence public opinion in support of these industries are giving the media a war against an alliance between the secret.
euronews:
Would you do that?
Kumi Naidoo:
Yes.
euronews:
It is possible to fight this situation?
Kumi Naidoo:
Build instructions are trying to fight would be more accurate. We started to be successful, but are not yet able to reach our goal.
For the mobilization of American public opinion seriously has no choice other than çabalamamızın.
euronews:
This is one of your strategic priorities?
Kumi Naidoo:
Our office is starting to fight in the U.S. from next year. We are already organizing a major campaign against coal. Energy Revolution,''''will continue to put the name of the war.
euronews:
Gösermek a few photos you want. Militants, boats, crane climb, a gym and a very important message to the extraordinary. These pictures are still the agenda? Can you describe the philosophy of Greenpeace in a few words?
Kumi Naidoo:
This 40 photos Greenpeace is a very important part of having a birthday.
But these photos, but not engaging enough to Greenpeace's public opinion about the execution than many are unknown.
Long negotiations with governments and companies are making to find a solution to the situation. A year ago when I came to Greenpeace for the first time we had to do two things conflicting with each other.
On the one hand to the environment to fight against the loss, on the other hand in giving hurt trying to break into the link.
Unfortunately, that our image as a natural interest in images published by media sets.
But these are not enough for us to show the work behind the scenes gerçekleştiridiğimiz.
World Economic Forum in Davos in January last wish to see me when I was very surprised when he saw how much the company managers. One of them is that they cause me some companies to invite us, he said to them, they do not want uğraşmamızı.
euronews:
This may be a sign of çekinmelerinin Greenpeace to boycott them, for example?
Kumi Naidoo:
Look me give you an example.
This year we launched a campaign against Nestlé over the internet. Because they are, as you know, the rain forests of Indonesia used the oil from palm trees cut. The Internet campaign in their palm oil from this region have provided almamalarını.
Some companies have a very well-known brands and famous for them. The brand they sell direct to the public ...
euornews:
Greenpeace in the face of the power of ... ...
Kumi Naidoo:
... Acts more vulnerable to unwanted.
But as you know, the most damaging to the environment and causing climate change Amerika'dakiler companies. For example, the oil group Cor. They are one of the greatest obstacles to the issue of climate. Or a giant food company, Cargill, soybean production forests in the Amazon because no one of most important actors.
But the fight against these companies for their products direct to the public sunmadıkları can be much more difficult.
euronews:
General Naidoo you correctly say, will you? Because if you başındasınız a huge army. The army, of course, a peaceful, but if this is the army still had a much larger, the collision in which region would you like it?
Kumi Naidoo:
Greenpeace is not appropriate for the army's image hardly have to say. The police never stopped us in jobs requiring courage direnmiyoruz atsam signature. We gösterilerimizi always trying to do by peaceful means.
But look at the history of social resistance makes the world a more livable and let me say equally.
Slavery, colonialism, apartheid, the right to vote to women, to obtain civil rights in America, like the great wars of humanity, that's enough honest people, causing them to say yaşanmamalı again.
Greenpeace names such as the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi or Martin Luther King took many lessons. Peaceful methods such as war and civil resistance, people realize the power in their hands and gave this power to use more serious.
But at the same time more than ever to bring people together and look for ways to savaşmalarının for an idea. For example, a coal power plant, such as creating a chain of meat in front of 10 thousand people.
Science, but not change the policy. For example, policies on climate change not, then you can expect to come together to provide the following to pass the message: if you ilerleyemezse policies, then you must change the politicians. This message is perhaps why they can no longer make decisions in real and constructive.
Kumi Naidoo, Thank you very much.
No comments:
Post a Comment