But now, for years, "Take off your pod in your mouth, what if you want to say clearly," he had seen the red bull as a part of sıkıştıranlardan attacks: "We açtırmayız discuss them!"
So what do you expect "I want to say clearly," saying? Just ask them and tell you what you can accept?
What kastediyordunuz "violence in politics is replaced by" saying to take? Political solution through all kinds of public and parliamentary debate and approval of the political project were elicited içermeyecekse what else to include the submission?
If you intend to do their own due diligence yasakçılığınıza the judiciary, "yasalarımız does not allow discussion of autonomy" to say, as you may know that the Constitutional Court does not think at all. The court's decision Hak-Park is to close the case, a model for further autonomy within the federation to defend freedom of opinion and Hak-Park is assessed for the program advocated by the federation hükmetmişti kapatılamayacağına.
Therefore, the time, "following the discussion following açtırmayız; include the following konuşturmayız" is not time to say, this discussion "controlled" can not be a debate whether to accept, instead of calling for a moment before the debate can start shouting.
Netleştirmemiz need them to start the discussion of a topic.
We have to find the answer to a question, there is always ahead of us: the Kurds and Turks to live together in peace is the best formula?
If this is the question, "we already are living together in peace, between the Turks and the Kurds do not have a problem if you say" again to return back to the eye and you receive the means to fight forever. Because of this conflict would last for thirty years, Crimea, where both sides to turn into a win, there is a problem in the middle, the Kurds (PKK-BDP'lilerin not only the Kurds) does not accept the current situation is an important sector, is now in the same state of Turkey did not want to live like a more just, more egalitarian and more free wants to reveal a relationship.
That is one option, do not like to go back to forgetting everything. So go forward with a new constitution and we have to build a new model of coexistence.
I Congress of the Democratic Society workshop wing of the PKK-BDP in a draft to put their views in this regard, I find positive.
I wrote two articles prior to the workshop agenda for a long time the issue of speaking in Kurdish with the BDP leaders' unilateral declaration of autonomy, "they received as part of the plan worry that I had written. This concern is resolved completely after the workshop, representatives say, but their descriptions of the BDP, BDP-at least for now-as the autonomy to impose a fait accompli instead chose to open the discussion, which shows that they have offered us to participate in the discussion, put forward a draft discussion, critical mission loads.
But it underlined it should be noted that the greatest wrong done here, this debate on the conduct of a single draft, the acceptance or rejection on the basis of this draft is to live a various alignments. Because of this issue, the Kurdish-Turkish yorduğu we head for years, all of us are closely related to a subject and frequency response of two key questions asked trying to find the right answer. We have already laid down in the text is not the only text in the last workshop. Discussion panel, previously prepared by Omer Dincer, but was vetoed by Sezer Local Government Law Reform Bill, can accept as a guide to the text that the European Charter of Local Self-Government, that many years ago, Tarhan Erdem, prepared under the leadership of the Democratic Republic of the local governance model set out in Program , however, experienced politicians have done for three consecutive terms Celal Dogan mayor explained to the public to prepare and we are not even aware of the existence of models and people who knows how many drafts, how many reports, how many projects ...
Something must be done now, all these texts by slog slog, producing other texts, taking advantage of the experiences of other countries, we discuss a unique model to create a cutthroat.
Today, there are two dangers that threaten this debate in front of us: one of them cut through the judicial debate, and the other pressures of the PKK threat, and withdrawal.
The solution with the same determination to oppose the threat to those who want to have both.
Notice that, since the beginning of my summer I say everything, I still procedural ...
Now you can enter the basis, what kind of autonomy that is, how a local administration, an administrative structure, questions of how to enter into the critique of the draft in light of the PKK.
No comments:
Post a Comment