Fashion - Style - Trendy

Famous American political scientist, scholar and thinker Noam Chomsky, Wikileaks'ın published documents will change and then commented on how world politics. According to Chomsky, "illegitimate governments compress the ranks of applications."

In 1971, a military analyst Daniel Ellsberg leaked by 47-volume Pentagon Papers, contained historical information about the U.S. presence in Vietnam from 1945-1967. Americans are starting to run the New York Times learned of the documents that you lie to their governments; reaction of the war, its dissolution was effective. 7 thousand pages of propagation of this information as part of the great philosopher Noam Chomsky. Chomsky, Wikileaks Newsweek later evaluated Yaraç'a Nevra Turkey. Here's the interview.

"VERY HARD TO KEEP SECRET"

Daniel Ellsberg'in Documents Pentagon in 1971, with Howard Zinn helped leak. Target and look in terms of results, do you see parallels between yourself, Julian Assange?

Not a lot. The Pentagon Papers, government policy and is applied to figure out how to create an invaluable contribution on the offering, including 25-year high-level planning, detailed and intensive intra-belgelerdi government. Wikileaks is an interesting, although usually limited to the reliability of the superficial reports contain the diplomatic correspondence.

Wikileaks ifşaatları affect the field of diplomacy? Can we say that we are entering the period of informal diplomacy?

I doubt very much will change, of course, apart from that I hold more privacy and security concern. Of course, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, to repeat such a ridiculous mistake.

"Post-Wikileaks," the period of what will be the main determinants?

Very difficult to control the flow of information channels so fast that it is difficult in an era of secrecy is now confirmed to what extent. I do not think today would be a very different era in the post-Wikileaks.

"Ranks SIKLAŞTIRACAKLAR"

Do you think this incident to justify secrecy and makes the world more closed?
Any one working on the archives have been released, the main reason for the confidentiality of governments to defend themselves against the people of that must be discovered. In return, governments in these illegal practices sıklaştıracaklarını think their ranks. There is a need to specify the irony here. He, on the one hand governments are doing limited access to their own citizens at the same time gaining the citizens complained about every aspect of their lives is extremely powerful to establish surveillance and information gathering systems.

So, transparency and democratic Is it always good? Should there be boundaries?
Transparency is a value and it is the obligation to prove a very heavy against the newcomers.

Historically, those affecting the foreign policies of states such as leaks Did it happen?
I do not think it would be very effective. Yes, you can create a more dramatic impact on foreign policy at the time was ifşaatlar. But I can not say very impressed.