Today, no one asked the question but the fact that everyone asks:
Wikileaks'in the hands of every document, regardless of the back of the front, such as mind blowing really ethical to publish?
NATO's nuclear secrets, such as nuclear missiles in Turkey that passwords yayınlasaydı ... Would it be ethical Again?
"Yes, I would say" one more question: However, not satisfied with that, the security measures at airports against terrorist attacks açıklasaydı .. Still, "Ethics," Could we say, what you've done?
Journalists Association of Canada does not belong to me, these questions ask the Ethics Committee Chairman, Professor Stephen Ward. The answer is clear: Everyone must comply with the ethical rules in such Wikileaks'in there should be.
"The journalist shall strive to minimize the damage to give to others," he says, one of the fundamental principles of journalistic ethics.
Wikileaks was?
Actually, yes.
250 thousand leaked document, incelesinler away, they do the necessary editing, and removing the names to be called çıkarsınlar New York Times, the Guardian has no such reputable newspapers.
Simon Jenkins, author of The Guardian newspaper wrote this clearly: Wikileaks'in documents from the five Western publications (the British The Guardian, American New York Times, the German Der Spiegel, Le Monde, the French, the Spanish El Pais) to work around the clock for two months, the documents wiped out many names.
Without knowing the names of the people the right to publish documents of defense because it was not ethical.
Of course there are other reasons: to write the names on the target would make a lot of people. And I had a chance to pass into the hands of the enemy's war plans.
The Guardian did its part, the ethics of journalism gözetti.
An example of how what you've done this, England: Wikileaks documents, "fond of women," he is a minister last .. Name? According to The Guardian newspaper, "xxx."
Another example: A German ... Wikileaks published by Der Spiegel in Germany, according to the documentation of the American Embassy information about the coalition talks, even the leaked document. Name: Unknown.
And ... a Turkish journalist, a woman ... according to the documentation of Wikileaks information about the Turkish government said that U.S. authorities. Name: Clearly written.
Why?
To protect the dignity of the minister's attention to British, Turkish journalists esirgenmesinin what justification?
What sorrowful turn off of the name, the right to determine which one is written in clear, British, American, French journalists denied given us, why?
"Because the world does not trust the Turkish media say" journalist brothers.
Description of outright discrimination Is that ethical?
I frankly do not think that the Guardian editors less fair.
What kind of double standard is this?
No comments:
Post a Comment