HAKAN Çopur - Political, Economic and Social Research. Foundation (SETA)
251.287 of this paper was written, until the day the document, only 281 were announced at hand, ie the phrase is used in elections than 1 percent of the cases, even yet, not explained. So it is premature to talk of the event winners and kaybedenlerini. But the remarkable thing is, all of these 7.918 250 thousand in the document with the document in Ankara, the capital of Washington, sent out as the emergence of the document is very diplomatic.
This means that the American Embassy in Ankara, and have done a lot of overtime in a sense, 'doing business' of the country to compile and collect whatever. Of course, the issues mentioned in the documents showing a large number of people who strive to reach the embassy to see that in terms of opening the mind was the Wikileaks documents. Well, almost the last days of the agenda of Turkey captured the event, how to evaluate Wikileaks? In this article, a short assessment of the event can be found 8 question Wikileaks.
1 - Wikileaks how it was able to obtain confidential diplomatic documents? The answer to this question, the U.S. State Department to make the world an explanation and apology from many countries to require the kind of ally contains a shame. Wikileaks'in founder Julian Assange currently outside the United States (Switzerland) lives and how to obtain these documents that are not yet clear, but U.S. military intelligence analyst, Bradley Manning is believed to be the source of documents.
However, an analyst at a secret document revealing a huge number of countries would not be able to easily swallow a bite. Document leaks and publishing information considered as espionage and crime is not a slight or Wikileaks think very brave, or someone wants to be heard of these documents already.
2 - Wikileaks yayımlayabildi how these documents? Let's say that the state would probably get angry or something to someone in the military gave classified documents to this site, what this site has already announced to explain how these documents yayımlayabildi? Or so Democratic that the U.S. does not interfere in their bedroom, even leading to a site and the "journalist's task is to explain the truth," thinks the purity of, or in the middle really have a acziyet and the United States is unable to cope with Julian Assange. Lover of democracy that the U.S. probably do not think so. Wikileaks can not cope with the graver in the U.S. chart, but so far from credibility. Therefore, both options can not answer the question fully, so the "how" question, the answer is still ambiguous and open to conspiracy.
3 - Wikileaks documents reflect the fact that the Turkish government against the extent to which issues? Turkey in general the documents related to the so far described, in particular the government's 'corrupt' the unnamed source, received / heard from many news shows in the documents sent to Washington. Clearly many of them to put it, "a diplomatic rumors" and consists of the value of information does. Made similar speeches in many places prior to the Sept. 12 referendum, but most of the information is either hearsay or highly exaggerated aktarıldığına we had witnessed. This "news" s / sensations, as if to explain documents to Wikileaks, "information" imiş is perceived as a real tragic dimension.
Not a single American
4 - Foreign policy documents to Wikileaks in terms of how will it affect Turkish-American relations? Medium-long term, these documents will affect the overall progress in Turkish-American relations do not have sufficient reason to. Likely to arise in roughness between the two countries resolved by the decision makers. Orientation of Turkish foreign policy is concerned with the issue about the size of the unknown there is not a new situation just got to say. 'Axis shift' is not begun discussions with Wikileaks, the Washington-Ankara route already discussed this issue for months, but despite this controversy continues to Turkish-American relations during the course of his own wavy. Eric Edelman, especially when you look at the period (2003-2005) against the government documents were found more correspondence. During this period, more than foreign policy decision-makers questioned and Islamism in Turkey is made more comments. Ambassador James Jeffrey Obama era, but especially for the period (2008-2010) documents a more positive analysis of the AK Party government and the prime minister is. Interpretation is usually based on inadequate analysis of the first period, while the government recently to understand the more I think it would be right to say that the effort was made based on the analysis. Not a single American so that once again we are treated.
5 - Wikileaks documents affect Turkey's internal political balance? This is the first description of his CHP is noteworthy that the critical question when searching for answers. How many years since the CHP, the government's 'corruption' is on a mission to uncover as we know very well. In the internal politics of this issue karıştırmayacağını MHP announced. Wikileaks documents, however, as a result, Turkey's domestic politics, not difficult to see a very intensive use. Sensation and gossip on the diplomatic political structure, a lot of time dealing with documents that Wikileaks will enjoy. But the future of Turkish politics would be different than today and most of the comments to say the U.S. Embassy in Ankara / sensations based on need more than diplomatic considerations.
6 - Is it a reflection of U.S. foreign policy documents to Wikileaks? Of course, U.S. foreign policy is determined by looking at Ankara and other capitals to the diplomatic documents, but by classifying all these documents before, and then interpret and analyze spend sieve after reaching conclusion. Panel, the U.S. State Department Turkey Turkey closely to recognize the correspondence table as Phil Gordon hospitalized are assessed in the light of those comments. So it's not the documents, these documents by the Washington decision-making mechanisms that result from the evaluation of American foreign policy in the table reflects. Therefore, by looking at Wikileaks'e alone, "the U.S. was thinking about it like that saying" no side is analytical.
The same side of the Middle East
7 - Wikileaks documents, how will it affect the developments in the Middle East? Issues in the Middle East and the United States are known to those who closely followed the usual and common antipathy between Arab countries and Iran, the emergence of the documents, so the situation should not be surprising. Reasons aside, Saudi Arabia and Iran's intransigence on the one side is not considered new. The main point to note that almost never described in the documents related to Israel that it did not place a negative dimension. Despite the choppy course of US-Israeli relations is a powerful actor in the U.S. is still in favor of Israel against the Israeli document sealed olmamızda think there is a surprising situation. So far the Middle East front, there is nothing new.
8 - Is it a conspiracy Wikileaks case, Is there a turning point diplomacy? Obviously, it can only see as a turning point diplomacy event Wikileaks good intention. Both the disclosure of final form documents, and judging by the order of disclosure of documents that need resolving in the middle is clear that some of the doubts. Diplomatic relations between the U.S. and its allies, however, after that everyone is bound to be more careful, could be a turning point in this respect is to be. If you mean this event is more assertive, direct plot, but no one in this secret documents belonging to the U.S. State Department places just went away and unable to do anything to defend anyone's guess.
To see the event as a turning point as a result, Wikileaks is not correct to exaggerate, but also a requirement to give value to these documents is clear that it deserves. Last shout out to Turkish foreign policy as reflected in documents that appear to underline the lack of differences between the basic needs. This means that Turkey's foreign policy is really important is taking steps, and this new momentum, whether it behind closed doors of diplomatic correspondence, wants to get summits attended by world leaders is remarkable.
No comments:
Post a Comment