In 2007, a series exploring the Internet, the BBC carried a report on the wikileaks.org corresponding and thus related to the site began to follow the Altan Tanriverdi, a group founded on FriendFeed almost WikiLeaks'in 'translation branch' was.
Tanriverdi, the group formed by the existing 1,621 documents leaked by WikiLeaks 148'sinin turned and said, "In general, the mainstream media at least 1.5, up to 6 hours before we are issued telegrams," he said.
Ongoing Tanriverdi said they do not believe in conspiracy theories, "I'm printing societies, hidden at all times to stand against dirty relations have the potential to show a person who believes that and in front of me I do not see anything except an example of this occurred. The other hand, every activity in this way to look at an eyebrow lift, social consciousness, the source and the intended effect is to deny that it has the competence to evaluate the information independently, "he says.
>>>> 'Friendfeed.com / wikileakstr' and 'friendfeed.com / leaks' groups was how? Documents Were there such a work agenda in mind before you fall in? Can we learn from you the details of this process?
Realize it is based on the presence of a very strange coincidence WikiLeaks'in. In 2007, a series called the whistleblowers on the Internet researching, I came across an article on the BBC on the wikileaks.org. The report, which touted themselves as a version of Wikipedia is not censorship since that time have been following this site.
After learning the secret documents of U.S. embassies in the first reaction was run, and Twitter accounts for the site was constantly check. Twitter account 'insurance' until you see the files encrypted thepiratebay.org address was put in my mind there was a plan related to translation. Telegrams contains very important information that causes me to think after this incident, 'friendfeed.com / wikileakstr' group invited to contribute in the translation by establishing links to FriendFeed. At that time, konulmamıştı publication documents yet. Members of the group was organized in the process of downloading the encrypted file to the standby and, where necessary informed about how the file can be opened. Hundreds of group members. In short, we were ready.
>>>> Created, how many people in these groups there are translations that help? Translations are healthy and have created a system of how to transmit it correctly?
This issue can give a full number. So far as the current 1,621 by turning the group's 148'si existing telegrams to the full or summary. Telegrams with the publication of a group organizing chaos began to occur and this possibility could not find one. Users can continually added their translations and the translations of deals under the idea began to take place. Has become impossible to monitor the flow of time. The first group of translations stand out thanks to the moderators started to avoid blocking messages. Then 'friendfeed.com / leaks' by creating a group, according to telegrams ID numbers to organize and temporarily added to the translations, finding the most appropriate translations, and after reviewing the old ones have started to change with. Now easily 'friendfeed.com / leaks' group say that the telegraph was the best source for translations.
>>>> WikiLeaks documents began to run at night, a few paragraphs of documents, web sites of mainstream news media, while the subject, you create documents related to Turkey is an important part of the group (even if the main lines), translated, revealing removed. Do you think that night, 'citizen gazeteceliği' solladı how the mainstream media?
First, the community have a shield for a long time to lay down with FriendFeed. FriendFeed offers the opportunity to communicate more closely than other social networks. This is the fastest way to reach the platform provided us with opportunities and knowledge to use them until the end of desire. Organized and we took a very short time to complete the preparations for the translation. Translations in a spontaneous way, albeit shared, and was surrounded by main lines of telegraphs. In the meantime, a new telegram has been added to automatically control the application I developed. DDoS attacks uğramadığı telgraflardan times every minute with this application that controls the site before anyone else find the opportunity to become informed. Added telegrams within a few minutes 'friendfeed.com / leakage' is added as a link to the group. Telegrams also quickly add a new translation of the summary review, so that within 10 minutes following the publication of information about the group is going to have those who follow the telegraph. In general, the mainstream media at least 1.5, up to 6 hours before we are issued telegrams.
>>>> Different platforms on the Internet, organizing, and sharing of translation of these documents had not been contributing to the people, could go up to where you think the mainstream media to explain these documents? 'Citizen journalism' is played a role in determining the agenda?
However, we created the group, pointing to say "yes" too ambitious and probably would be a wrong answer. The 'citizen journalism' WikiLeaks'in doing it and we assume that we help them promote and to accelerate the achievement of knowledge. Now, 'censorship can not be' spread around the world ignored by the mainstream media does not seem possible documents. The real question here is how it sunacaklarıdır. Prevent a single pen telegrams, to take place with each other exactly opposite opinions, some diplomats' comments telgraflarda be very effective in the light of views they represent the mainstream media gives more disinformation. For example, a hard-working politician, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, indicating that using the telegraph, telegram claiming to be a bank account in Switzerland can ignore 8. You can also see our entries in our translation. FriendFeed users, the world is able to ignore the opinions of others beğenirken appropriate translations. The most important difference between us is our main stream media content regardless of the translation of a telegram when the cuff is the fact that the main page.
>>>> Documents by turning our language publishing any need for self-control and self-censorship, or have you heard? Editorial policy was?
As the most accurate and complete in order to transfer the existing contents of the old translations are often controlled by feedbacks. Information, even if it is unimportant to us, is all about working on adding content. From our perspective on the information that may lead to direct any changes, corrections, can not ignore that.
>>>> These documents are shocking for you to think and would you expect?
1 420 telegrams published in the current issue so far. This has created much of the effect of an earthquake, even all over the world, but my observation, this effect is staggering under the'm in a lot of information presented in the form of telegrams explained. International actors play a great game, game, thrusting out of the communities studied, for the first time to explain the rules of the game the opportunity to learn to find the best expression of this earthquake. Communities in the excitement about it. He had the opportunity to learn the secret language spoken by the people managing them. At this point I can give answer to the question, and mine is as you hear the excitement.
>>>> How do you define Wikileaks'i? A struggle for people's well-intentioned İktidarlardan independent? Diplomacy is a new card game opened?
I am continuing conspiracy theories, the most obvious expression of these activities is governed by certain powers, do not believe with. WikiLeaks, such as working groups organized under the constant search for other forces in my opinion is not an appropriate approach. I am printing societies, hidden dirty relations stance against the show always has the potential to be a human being who believes in front of me and I do not see anything except an example of this occurred. I will continue to believe in this way until proven otherwise. The other hand, every activity in this way to look at an eyebrow raising, social consciousness, regardless of the source and the intended effect is to deny that it has the competence to evaluate the information.
>>>> WikiLeaks, a kind of action could become the social struggles? After that similar actions in different planes, can we see?
WikiLeaks, this form of social struggle is already one of the most important forms of action. This action is in line with the format, "Knowledge liberates you" slogan has become the slogan of today's most radical and significant. Foci of global governance to take this power in the hands of a community can be made to present the most revolutionary activity. WikiLeaks'in come out victorious in this conflict, awaken people to the possibility of access to information can create a domino effect. Currently the most important action is to help WikiLeaks'in come out victorious in this conflict.
>>>> WikiLeaks close to 250 thousand in the hands of a relatively small part of the publishing of the document, the publication of all documents to extend a long period of time hinted. How do you think will move this process? Are we living WikiLeaks'le he'll catch on? Kanıksayacak are we?
Wikileaks eyes on the retention time in the middle of an attempt to spread, rather than slow the progress of studies have editorial. WikiLeaks, is trying to speed up this process in the hands of existing facilities, help in this regard is the various actors of the written press. Over time, this publication will accelerate the process. As I mentioned earlier, the information society sarsıcılığından too, brought excitement to get the case stricken. This excitement, I'm hopeful that will not allow kanıksamaya.
>>>> According to you how the internet in terms of information transparency of a medium-pollution?
As a programmer, the main expertise plunge 'data mining'. Irregular and large do an activity every day to remove information from the data. I think the reason this is not always seeing the Internet as a mine. This is mine, but you have too many resources to offer these resources to work to achieve, to get önleminizi against the dangers of the things under your control. Information pollution, we will achieve that knowledge to power a small price we have to endure.
>>>> "Citizen gazeteciliği'nin Where do you see the possibilities and limitations?
This non-expert can express an opinion as one of only superficial. For me the biggest plus shows the concept of citizen journalism, information on the drapes, the relations of interest to independent, objective of any routing pasture, the society may be removed by any individual is revealed. However, even this, the current function of the citizen journalism that does not mean that in a positive direction. Especially the possibilities of not only the emergence of new technology, enough for the entire community sees the information they need, is it more beatific, citizen journalism, or even a further step, the most powerful alternative to the mainstream media instead of the wrong points of view I find sets. Quite the contrary, citizen journalism, mainstream media could become a tool that feeds think it should be taken into consideration. Advancing social media, citizen journalism in particular, has become one of the main flow of the media food source, it will be followed by insecurity from the financial crisis had rendered many people observe rescue.
>>>> In general, when you look, people carried out on the Internet using different platforms, this 'amateur' journalism, mainstream media is able to fight against? Create a real alternative?
No, by subtracting the current state of the current uncertainty, the foundations of the right oturtulabilirse, viable as a means of pressure on the mainstream media. So here is such a thing 'against' the struggle, but her 'fix' is an attempt to become a power running. Is not an alternative to the current form, is supportive.
No comments:
Post a Comment