Partnership with the U.S. publication of his five published documents Wikileaks'ın organ is one of the British Guardian newspaper, answering questions from a live Assange intenet site.
Internet address of the target of cyber attacks that shook the world because of Wikileaks.org published documents have been canceled.
Wikileaks'e gave its name to the American company, "wikileaks.org" has canceled the address.
The name of the American secret diplomatic documents that describe Wikileaks'e EveryDNS company, a large number of cyber attacks target wikileaks.org address, he said.
EveryDNS, these attacks could hurt the company's infrastructure and saving, so I announced that the address has been canceled.
However, it soon closed down the site by taking a new name over Switzerland wikileaks.ch 'continued to broadcast from.
People ask that answer ...
Turkey and 15:00 hours at the start of implementation of the planned question and answer, the site crashed due to heavy influx of visitors.
More open about half an hour remaining on the page reads the comments section, forward a note to editors' questions with the new questions Assange'a closed. The site is half an hour after he began to publish responses from readers' questions Assange'dan.
Here are answers to the questions and Assange'ın:
Australia carry a passport. Do you think your country do not have to go back because of the possibility that Australian diplomats and the police arrest you for the moment is not in question?
I miss you so much an Australian citizen and the country. But in recent weeks, Prime Minister Julia Gillard and chief of staff at the same time my only kılmadı impossible to transform the U.S. government would help me and my friends also announced the arrest. This is what it means to open an Australian citizen.
Değiştirdiğnizi the world how do you think happened? Üzerinizdeyken your attention is, providing you with this information at the mole does deserve praise?
If you like the topic name on the back of the Pentagon leaks as claimed then that the young soldier manning a complete hero Bradley.
Do you think that censor the names of people you think might be in danger?
Wikileaks publication for four years. Damage as a result of activities during this period did not see even a single person. We do not expect any change in condition.
The U.S. government is questioning whether you are a journalist you. Are you a journalist? People journalist and not be active as long as you reach the information that can ahatsız the difference?
When I wrote the first non-fiction book 25 years old. Since then, newspapers, TV and the internet working. The journalist does not matter if I was a debate. Currently, my main task is to conduct research with other leading journalists.
Do you have documents about UFOs or extraterrestrial beings?
E-mail comes to us a lot about UFOs. However, two subjects in this mailer does not meet publication principles;
1 - The first oral written
2 - Original Signed
There are no documents that have been published that the reference to UFOs.
Did you expect to wake up to this effect in the world? Do you worry about your safety?
We always believe WikiLeaks'in exhibit a global role, and in 2007 made it clear since the replacement of the election results in Kenya. I still think we are slightly behind our plans and have a lot more to do. Threats to our lives, the subject of public opinion. Super Güç'le bargaining power to reach the rate of actin cautious.
XXX sansürlemenizi How do you explain such identities? Some documents were published only certain sections. This is not as important as who makes the decisions of the U.S. government?
News that are subject to our partners and ourselves by our press documents are explained. News, Edited by journalists is to prepare them. Prepared by an editor of the news media, at least, the process to make sure that the correct process and functioning once again under review.
Although DDoS attacks even if they are frustrating for you, seems like a good ad. At the very least increase your credibility. Amazon is now said to be çıkarıldığınız servers. Do you agree with this statement? Did you expect such an incident happen?
Since 2007, some of our servers as a conscious, we think that there the problem of freedom of expression yerleştiriyorduk places. Thus, the realities of free stuff, we wanted to separate. Amazon was one of them.
No one ever started a job durduramayacağı. Since the New World. Do you have the relevant documents in your hand ACTA'yla?
Yes, copyright and patent industry giants like the U.S., like the Trojan horse was created to please the Anti-Fraud Trade Agreement (ACTA) have regarding the documents in our hands. ACTA is a noticeable fact was the first infiltration Wikileaks'e.
Canadian PM's adviser Tom Flanagan recently, "I arranged the assassination of Assange'e ... If you lost out Assange will not be unhappy at all, "he said. What do you think about it?
Flanagan and others considered as abetting the murder of such statements.
Western governments have both received action to guarantee press freedom has moral authority claims. Undermines the claim that the legal sanction threats, and you Wikileaks'e. Into the risk of losing the moral authority of Western governments by attacking Wikileaks'e Do you think that? Even from the start Let me ask, Do you believe that Western governments of any moral authority?
Links to the West in a fundamental power relations, loans, shares and holdings malileştirdi via network. Promise in such an environment "free" because it easier to be a change in the political iradedeki very rarely brings this fundamental change in vehicles. That in the West, until the birds are free to not power. However, the heavy censorship in countries such as China, fear that word still has power and that power. Pointing to the power of censorship for the word all the time to see it as an economic relationship. Buzek attacks on the United States points to a great hope, promise to be as powerful as the hope of financial wall yıkabilecek.
The past five days or more before the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan about the sızıntılarda, Afghan informants mentioned in the documentation that you have given in? I'm sorry but I am using this word, to shut out people from a dangerous situation in the application names do you think of censorship? Meanwhile, history will forgive you. Health in your hand.
Wikileaks'in have a history of four years. In this process, have not had such a claim. Even if a person, including employees of our institutions such as the Pentagon did not see the harm our work. People experiencing situations of mutual retaliation efforts and intrigues puts more manipulation. Duruşumuzda do not expect any change happening.
Wikileaks this "megasızıntı" from the other documents before publishing the site Wikileaks'in what happened? "Technical irregularities" in the internet through in re-publish these documents, Are you?
The majority of the documents at mirror.wikileaks.info publication, the engineering problems of the rest of the site will install hallettikçe. Since April of this year determining factor to their own schedule ourselves. Step the U.S. government focuses on applications of violence against us. But three and a half years of my and others' work can be accessed by the public to see if you are unhappy.
Julian, representing Wikileaks'i was necessary to have a face? The lack of a well-known representative of the organization is a much better thing Do not you think? All of the discussions took a personal state, focused on you. News began to spread everywhere, with your name, Wikileaks özleşleşmeye you started. Now, no one mentions the Wikileaks'ten as an organization. Many people do not even realize that Wikileaks'in behind the others. And I think this situation makes Wikileaks'i vulnerable. Because this way, the easier you can blame your enemies. If they convince people that you are a company making your bad purposes, so you can be at this show as a terrorist who rape women, largely sarsılacaktır Wikileaks'in reliability. However, to respect what you are doing so far, but I believe you are to the fore, while remaining behind the scenes Wikileaks'in unfair to the team being brave.
It's an interesting question. At first, I've spent too much effort for the lack of one, representing Wikileaks'i. Because the institution did not want to give egolara place. We also go in the footsteps of French mathematics, used false names. However, this increase people's curiosity, but has caused some of them show themselves as if there in our organization. At the end of the day, one of us had to come out before the people and the courage to disclose only showing itself in a leadership that could provide resources to risk themselves. In this process, I've been finding himself in the spotlight. Then I was subjected to different attacks. However, many people have gained the trust of.
No comments:
Post a Comment