Will Do the FIFA officials in Zurich, Switzerland on Thursday, a meeting be held in 2018 and 2022 World Kupalarının decision which will connect the countries.
In 2018 the tournament will be held in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Belgium, Russia and Spain / Portugal has become a candidate, and between these countries Spain / Portugal is one step ahead of Russia with the speakers.
The 2022 tournament in Australia, Japan, Qatar, South Korea and the U.S. was slated to different countries around the world, such as. The vote of the tournament in Qatar in the race, is expected to be between Australia and the United States.
ESPN Soccernet is closely related to several countries before the big day that Tom Adams, author of the analysis of the offer:
2018 World Cup candidates
UNITED KINGDOM
Pros: Sepp Blatter to say like "You can organize a World Cup even if England tomorrow." Both the quality of the stadium, as well as the infrastructure is not lacking in any plan offered by an impressive dutumda England FIFA in terms of profitability. In short, the obvious choice would be safe in terms of England's FIFA.
Cons: Great Britain as a result of the news media and was dismissed two members of FIFA to take part in Thursday's vote at the accusations that four üyeyle. Both FIFA, as well as news of England's bid committee, members of the British newspapers expressed many were not satisfied and insisted that Britain's attitude could be a factor against being expressed.
Chances: Gradually decreases. FIFA members are anxious to have the news in the British media. England, CONCACAF president Jack Warner was looking through the eyes of the confederation, but the next three vote guaranteed by the BBC about the negative news in the name of one of Warner. Similarly, a member of FIFA Vice-President of the Cameroonian Issa Hayatou'nun name goes in the news, and this may compromise the votes will come from Africa. British bid committee chairman Andy Anson, said that Britain's favorite.
NETHERLANDS / BELGIUM
Pros: Earlier in the Euro 2000 tournament with the promise of an environmentally friendly while regulating the Netherlands and Belgium has come forward. Infrastructure and the stadium is not an issue for the two countries accused of corruption related to a lack of any advantages to the households of this writing.
Cons: "The government guarantees," in terms of bids as low risk, while other countries, the Netherlands / Belgium as a medium risk assessment by the FIFA organization is one of the disadvantages. Also known as FIFA's tournament in one country düzenlenemesini preferred.
Chances: close to zero. Betting companies in the Netherlands and Belgium in the case of the two countries from the least chance. Hopes that some of the representatives of Europe and Africa could be persuaded, though, FIFA is expected to choose these two countries.
RUSSIA
Pros: A strong Russian state, waiting for governments to support FIFA's esirgemiyor. This political support, the budget is a factor in preventing the terms of any problems with. In addition, the FIFA World Cup in the east in terms of organizing for the future of Russia's advantage seems to mean exploring new areas.
Cons: the need for infrastructure investment and the large distances between the potential host cities for the FIFA inspectors rated Russia as a country of moderate risk. In addition, racism is still prevalent among the fans of Russian President Vladimir Putin's decision and will not go to Zurich on the day of the factors that reduce the chances of Russia.
Chances: If your favorite is currently the largest in Russia, worked very well all over the world to collect votes, and the representative of Germany's influential Franz Beckenbauer'ın as well as Asian countries are said to use their votes to Russia.
SPAIN / PORTUGAL
Pros: Along with being the last European and world champions, Barcelona and Real Madrid also hosts two camels in Spain, the case is currently the driving force of world football. In addition, the infrastructure, stadium amenities in terms of quality and technological aspects of the two countries have inferior to England.
Cons: FIFA's report will be at a disadvantage in terms of these two countries the following sentence: "a clear operational concept of peacekeeping and security issues that are undiagnosed." Spain and Portugal, FIFA does not the fact that the only country in accordance with the trend in these countries is another problem. The two countries also mention the current economic problems.
Chances: High. Although companies are betting favorites in the third place ranking Although Orange and South America to Spain, and the next vote, even though both have denied it later president of the Asian Federation Mıhamed Bin Hammam can vote. Günye Korea and Turkey will support the rumors that the duo in question.
2022 World Cup candidates
AUSTRALIA
Pros: FIFA to give the tournament in Australia in terms of being this great organization will carry a great deal of Oceania for the first time will be significant. The 2000 Sydney Olympics, Australia had demonstrated the success of the organization and the island country's stadiums, transport, infrastructure and security has much of a problem.
Cons: Geography. In Australia's time zone, which will follow the tournament on TV in Europe and North and South American football fans is a serious problem. In addition, the size of the country's transport problems. Australia accused of corruption with the support of the dismissal of Tahitian member Reynald Temarii'nin is reduced.
Chances are: Australia, particularly in Europe and Africa will work to gather votes. Although the United States and Qatar to the forefront even though undisclosed, to pass the first round if one of the countries capable of surprise. Effective member Franz Beckenbauer at the German name of one of Australia will be supporting.
JAPAN
Pluses: the 2002 World Cup. South Korea is a problem with the tournament organizer, and the infrastructure, the quality of the stadium, and the hospitality of Japan for the last exam is another advantage, the games run as three-dimensional, digital ticketing and proposed projects will offer the audience the opportunity to explore stadiums GPS devices out.
Cons: the 2002 World Cup. This is to be held until shortly before the tournament in case of Japan's biggest drawback. In addition, European and American markets in terms of time zone a country yaşatabilecek specific problems. FIFA, the Japanese government to stop supporting the proposal also complain enough.
Chances: Not many. Currently betting companies in the Asian country of 20 to 1 by the shortage of basic, behind the proposal's lack of political will and support of significant members of FIFA.
QATAR
Pros: Oil-rich Qatar has no problem with any budget and need the stadium to be built with the latest technology projects, as well as the support of celebrities such as Pep Guardiola is a good campaigned and Zinedine Zidane. Qatar's geographical location does not create a nuisance in terms of the TV revenues for the first time in the Middle East and FIFA World Cup warm to the idea of looking at regulation is known.
Cons: The biggest problem in terms of FIFA up to 50 degrees in summer and heat in terms of health is a serious risk factor. In addition, in 10 of 12 stadium will take place within 25-30 mile radius of a circle is another problem. Qatar is also the target of unethical opposition claims.
Chances: Very high. Qatar is currently the case and the 2022 World Cup in Spain, as well as the biggest favorite, Africa, South America and Asia are most received some votes in the warranty.
SOUTH KOREA
Pros: Just like Japan in 2002, positive experiences, infrastructure, technology, the stadium in terms of quality and security of South Korea's largest advantage of the absence of any problem. Among candidate countries, only South Korean leader 2022'ye Hwang-sik personally lobby on behalf of the country will go to Zurich. In addition, North Korea, tensions in the region will contribute to the needs of peace 'in South Korea over the idea of a World Cup.
Cons: Too short a time ago that the organization had hosted the biggest disadvantage in terms of South Korea. In addition, the problems in the country in another time zone, and the North Korea problem.
Chances: Not many. South Korea's tournament to win the right to edit small needs a miracle.
UNITED STATES
Pros: The most important part of the FIFA proposal would bring the United States has a high financial advantage. According to the Bloomberg report, only the UK and the U.S. proposals, FIFA's criteria is to provide income. The last tournament held in the United States had created a record 3.6 million people watch matches. Not live in the North American representative, another advantage of any infrastructure issue.
Cons: The government guarantees the absence of the U.S. proposal as a mid-scale assessment of risk has led to an offer. The U.S. government may not meet all FIFA's requests. Another problem is the distance between the stadiums.
Chances: The Secret favorite. U.S., Qatar and Australia the next three votes behind CONCACAF'tan confident even if the United States, Europe, South America and Africa to receive the support of some members to throw a surprise signing.
No comments:
Post a Comment